For whom is Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) indicated?
Which categories of patients?
A majority of patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or cardiac surgery are offered CR (high referral rates in countries such as France, Belgium and Bosnia and Herzegovina) but CR services to heart failure patients are severely underused across Europe, although there are some good practices (France, Belgium, Italy)
Ways of referral:
Patients are usually referred following a cardiologist assessment from either the discharging cardiac hospital, hospital-based clinics, community cardiologists or primary care physicians. France seems to be the only member that adapted standardized referral by an automatic software. France’s strategy accounted for a referral rate of 36% after AMI, 60-70 % after cardiac surgery, and 9 % after a first hospitalisation for Heart Failure. Bosnia and Herzegovina claimed that 60% of patients after an AMI, PCI or cardiac surgery are being referred down the line. Belgium reported that 78% of patients aged < 80 years who were hospitalized for a coronary event were advised to follow CR.
The general referral rates vary strongly across Europe (figure 1).
The general uptake rates vary strongly across Europe (figure 2).
Which Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programme is provided?
The description of phase II components differs little between the countries:
- supervised exercise sessions with graduated circuit training
- educational programs including smoking cessation
- risk factor management
- food and physical activity counseling
- psychosocial support
Type of physical training
Exercise training in patient groups remains the cornerstone of most CR programmes.
In Israel, some centres have added sessions of respiratory muscle training, Tai Chi and Yoga.
In the United Kingdom many programmes also offer individual, home-based rehabilitation such as the Heart Manual programme for those not wishing or unable to attend group programmes, and more recently evidence has demonstrated the utility of web-based cardiac rehabilitation.
The outpatient programme duration varies between countries:
- some provide short programmes lasting 3-4 weeks (Germany, Latvia, Russia, Slovakia, Italyand Bosnia and Herzegovina)
- others have programmes of 6-12 weeks (Malta, The Netherlands, France, Ireland and Sweden)
- a few have programmes exceeding 12 weeks (Estonia, Poland and Egypt)
By whom is the Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programme conducted?
The multi-disciplinary structure of the CR team (usually comprising a physician, nurse, physiotherapist, dietician, psychologist and social worker) is relatively consistent across all countries with some differences:
Cardiologists are usually programme coordinators (Israel, Ireland, Russia, Portugal, Spain, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belgium and France), but even rehabilitation specialists may take the lead (Estonia, Portugal and Bosnia and Herzegovina). In several countries nurses and/or physiotherapists are in charge (United Kingdom, Sweden, Malta, Malta, Greece).
In Israel, Egypt,Portugal, United Kingdom, and Greece an exercise physiologist/masters may be welcomed to the phase II team working in team with the physiotherapists. On the contrary, phase II exercise classes in Ireland, Poland, Lebanon, Spain, Malta, Italy and Belgium are only run by physiotherapists
Although Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended by the 2016 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice there are few recommendations for formal education of the CR team members.
In general, the 2016 European Guidelines on CVD Prevention in Clinical Practice are applied, but several countries have specific national guidelines: Belgium , France, Estonia, Israel, Italy and Slovenia.
Where is the Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programme offered?
In general, hospital-linked or healthcare-linked CR programmes are more commonly used in the Western and Northern part of Europe, programmes at specialised institutions are more widespread in the Eastern countries, whereas Southern European countries provide both alternatives.
In the majority of the reporting countries, phase II was available only as an outpatient service. Well described examples can be found in Ireland, Portugal, Malta, Slovakia, Italy, United Kingdom and Belgium.
In Iceland and Germany, both inpatient and outpatient options are available according to patients’ preference, whereas in France and Croatia inpatient rehabilitation is only offered to post-surgical or high-risk patients in particular. Mainly in-patient models are reported from Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan and Russia.
CR at home
What is the quality and what are the costs?
Cost for patients, reimbursement
In most countries CR is provided within the framework of national or regional health services. There are countries with a significant number of privately-run centres, mainly in the Mediterranean zone (Portugal, Spain, Italy and Croatia).
Reimbursement varies, depending on the indication for CR: acute coronary syndromes and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are usually covered by all. The costs are covered by national health services and insurance companies, however in several countries even the patients must contribute (figure 3):
|Public funding||Public co-funding||Third party funding/Patient financed|
|Israel (public and private venues)||Turkey||The Netherlands (cardiologist referral)|
|Ireland (public venues)||Estonia (if < 6 months post AMI)||Slovakia (specific indications)|
|Bulgaria||Sweden (if > high cost protection)||Lebanon (exclusively paid by patients)|
|Latvia (inpatient)||Egypt||Greece (mostly private)|
|Lithuania||Croatia (specific indications)|
|Slovakia (specific indications)|
|Italy (public and private venues)|
|Bosnia and Herzegovina|
|Croatia (specific indications)|
|Belgium (reimbursement for capped
maximum number of sessions)
|Portugal (public venues)|
Audit and quality control
Certain countries have implemented specific accreditations attesting whether CR centres meet minimum standards. In Belgium an audit is under way for quality control in several CR centres to be published in 2017.
In The Netherlands, each 3 months participating clinics receive periodic feedback on quality indicators accompanied by an educational outreach visit. Similar efforts are made in France and the United Kingdom.
Surveys and databases
Periodic national surveys on centre distribution, disease epidemiology, patient demographics and outcomes data have been informative in many countries (Turkey, United Kingdom, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Italy, Greece, Belgium and France).
Israel has recently developed a similar platform but just for heart failure patients. These models are expected (or have shown already!) to increase adherence with the guideline-recommended therapeutic decisions, support patient management, data archiving and quality assessment for CR.
Plans for the future
Some common health system-related obstacles reported were:
- Insufficient availability of beds and ambulatory facilities (Portugal, France)
- Lack of funding (Latvia, Egypt, Lebanon, Portugal, Greece)
- Uneven geographical distribution of CR centres (Portugal, Spain)
Some professionals-related obstacles were also described, namely:
- Small community CR not routinely being practiced (Israel)
- Insufficient adherence to the guidelines related to professional knowledge and attitude (The Netherlands, Portugal, United Kingdom)
- Insufficient number of cardiopulmonary physiotherapists available (Turkey)
Strategies for Secondary Prevention and CR
Innovative solutions for the future proposed in the action plans included:
- The use of CR delivery as an established national health system quality indicator (Israel)
- referral of non-classical CR indications (Israel)
- risk factor counselling reimbursement by insurance companies (Germany)
- continued reinforced intervention up to 3 years after rehabilitation (Italy)
- development of web-based programs (The Netherlands)
- establishment of individualized models of CR (Sweden)
- setup of an educational programme for pupils and their parents (Portugal)
- centre certification to incorporate improvement in exercise capacity/risk reduction outcomes (United Kingdom)
- the support of lagging programmes by the top performing programmes (France)
- frailty tailored CR programs (Challenges in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: A call for action) (1).
In fact, in the framework of the ESC Prevention of CVD Programme, which is led by the EAPC in collaboration with ACCA and ACNAP, a consensus document "Challenges in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: A call for action" (1) was recently published in which some of the existing gaps for secondary prevention strategies were reviewed and effective interventions/innovative strategies in relation to the patients, healthcare providers and healthcare systems were endorsed.
Results of first online survey
To consolidate missing data in the country of the month reports an online survey was sent to National Coordinators of 54 ESC member countries (57% participation rate).
Download results (pdf)
Overview of Cardiac Rehabilitation - Part 2
To access part 2, go to:
Note: The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.