In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Thrombectomy With Anticoagulation Versus Anticoagulation Alone for Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Primary Outcomes from the STORM-PE Trial

By the ESC WG on Pulmonary Circulation & RVF

Pulmonary Embolism

The Storm PE study is important because, despite more than a decade of endovascular therapy and multiple approved devices, robust randomized evidence comparing catheter-based treatment with anticoagulation alone in pulmonary embolism has been limited. In the STORM PE trial, 100 patients were randomized to catheter-assisted vacuum thrombectomy plus anticoagulation versus anticoagulation alone, with the primary outcome being the change in RV/LV ratio at 48 hours. The thrombectomy group demonstrated a significantly greater reduction and more frequent normalization of RV/LV ratio, without an increase in major adverse events. These findings support the use of catheter-directed thrombectomy combined with anticoagulation in intermediate- to high-risk PE and underscore the need for larger trials to evaluate long-term and mortality outcomes.

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation & Right Ventricular Function

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903, Sophia Antipolis, FR

Tel: +33.4.92.94.76.00