In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Percutaneously reducing secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure appears futile

Cardiovascular Surgery
Valvular Heart Disease
Chronic Heart Failure

Munich, Germany – 27 Aug 2018: Percutaneously reducing secondary mitral regurgitation appears futile when tested in all heart failure patients, according to late breaking research presented today in a Hot Line Session at ESC Congress 2018 (1) and published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

European guidelines state that percutaneous edge-to-edge repair may be considered in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation and heart failure considered high risk for open heart surgery(2). The intervention involves inserting one or more clips through the femoral vein then attaching the two mitral valve leaflets together so that they close more effectively.

Professor Jean-Francois Obadia, principal investigator, Civil Hospices of Lyon, France, said: “We show for the first time that despite reducing secondary mitral regurgitation, percutaneous repair of the mitral valve does not improve survival or symptoms, or reduce heart failure hospitalisations compared to standard medical treatment alone. This strongly suggests that this procedure is futile in patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation.”

Around 2% of adults in developed countries have heart failure, rising to more than 10% of people over 70 years of age(3). Typical symptoms include breathlessness, ankle swelling, and fatigue, caused by the heart’s inability to pump enough blood out of the left ventricle to meets the body’s needs.

In the advanced stages of heart failure the left ventricle dilates, causing the mitral valve to close insufficiently and incorrectly allow blood to leak back into the left atrium (called mitral regurgitation). It is labelled “secondary” because the mitral valve is structurally normal, but does not work properly due to a dilated left ventricle. Although associated with a worse prognosis, there is no evidence that reducing secondary mitral regurgitation improves survival.3

The study examined whether this procedure could reduce the rate of all-cause death or unscheduled hospitalisation for heart failure over 12 months compared to optimal medical treatment alone.

A total of 304 patients with symptomatic heart failure, poor left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction 15–40%), and severe secondary mitral regurgitation were enrolled from 37 hospitals in France. Patients received optimal medical treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (if not tolerated, an angiotensin receptor blocker was substituted), a beta-blocker, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a diuretic.

Patients were then randomly assigned to undergo percutaneous mitral valve repair or no intervention (control group). Patients were followed-up for 12 months.

More than 90% of procedures were performed successfully and there were no significant safety concerns. Mitral regurgitation was substantially reduced in patients who underwent the procedure compared to those who received medical therapy alone. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint of death and unscheduled heart failure rehospitalisation at 12 months, which occurred in 55% of patients receiving the intervention and 52% of patients treated with medical therapy alone (p=0.53).

Professor Obadia said: “The reduction in mitral regurgitation that was achieved with the intervention did not translate into a clinical benefit in patients with heart failure. There is therefore no reason to perform this procedure in all patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation. Other randomised trials could examine whether there are subgroups that might be more suitable candidates.”


Notes to editor

Results of the COAPT Trial in more than 600 patients with mitral regurgitation and systolic heart failure are set to be announced in September 2018. The data should help clarify use of this procedure.

SOURCES OF FUNDING: This study was funded by the French Ministry of Health and Research National Programme 2012 grant number DGOS 12-027-0355 and a grant from Abbott Vascular.

DISCLOSURES: Research Grants from Abbott Vascular and Neochord; Consultant Fees for Edwards, Medtronic, Servier, Novartis, Landanger and Delacroix Chevallier.


(1) study - A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of percutaneous mitral valve repair in secondary mitral regurgitation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction” will be discussed during:

(2) Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.

(3) Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–2200. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128.


ESC Press Office
For press enquiries, independent comment, please contact the ESC Press Office at

To access congress scientific resources visit ESC Congress 365.

About the European Society of Cardiology

The European Society of Cardiology brings together health care professionals from more than 150 countries, working to advance cardiovascular medicine and help people lead longer, healthier lives.

About ESC Congress 2018

ESC Congress is the world’s largest and most influential cardiovascular event contributing to global awareness of the latest clinical trials and breakthrough discoveries. ESC Congress 2018 takes place 25 to 29 August at the Messe München in Munich, Germany. Explore the scientific programme.


This press release accompanies both a presentation and an ESC press conference at the ESC Congress 2018. Edited by the ESC from material supplied by the investigators themselves, this press release does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Society of Cardiology. The content of the press release has been approved by the presenter.