In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN). A Phase II study of autologous mesenchymal stromal cells and c-kit positive cardiac cells, alone or in combination, in patients with ischaemic heart failure: the CCTRN CONCERT-HF trial

Comment by the ESC WG on Cardiovascular Regenerative & Reparative Medicine

Chronic Heart Failure
Treatment
Heart Failure


Heart failure (HF), caused by ischemic-induced cardiomyopathy, has still a poor prognosis. Although cell therapy has drawn extraordinary controversy since applied, it is still followed as a potential approach to treat ischemic HF. In recent work by Bolli and colleagues, transendocardial injection with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and c-kit positive cardiac cells (CPCs) was given alone or in combination in a multicentre trial approach. The 7 centres enrolled 125 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 29% and a scar size of 19% (NYHA class II/III), in which the treatment was shown to be safe and feasible. Even with maximal guideline-based therapy, both MSC as CPC were associated with improved clinical outcomes (MACE and quality of life, 6- and 12-months post injection), but without clear ventricular functional or structural changes (MRI scans). These observations, once more, suggest a strong systemic or paracrine mechanism of effect in these patients. Interestingly, no additive effects of MSC and CPC could be observed on a structural myocardial level as was previously indicated in preclinical work, although this Phase II design is also not designed to claim such observations. These findings are generating more support to further explore how paracrine signals can support HF patients. At the same time, they also promote that for a structural change of the myocardium, other approaches are warranted, such as maybe suggested by work this month on remuscularization via engineered heart patches.

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Regenerative and Reparative Medicine

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903, Sophia Antipolis, FR

Tel: +33.4.92.94.76.00