In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

5 studies published on the efficacy and safety of novel antithrombotic therapy

Since ESC 2011 five interesting studies have been published on the efficacy and safety of novel antithrombotic therapy.
Venous Thromboembolism

The TRACER trial

A dose-finding study with the oral platelet thrombin receptor blocker vorapaxar on top of dual antiplatelet therapy in elective PCI found a reduction of ischemic complications without an increase in bleeding when compared to aspirin and clopidogrel alone.1

In the TRACER trial 12,944 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST-segment elevation were randomized to vorapaxar 40 mg loading dose then 2.5 mg daily or placebo on top of standard of care, usually including dual antiplatelet therapy, and were followed for 13 months.2 The primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, recurrent ischemia with hospitalization or urgent revascularization) was reduced by vorapaxar from 19.9% with placebo to 18.5%, but this failed to reach statistical significance (HR, 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 - 1.01 p = 0.07). The secondary endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke was significantly reduced by vorapaxar (in most cases meaning triple oral antiplatelet therapy) when compared to placebo (with most taking dual antiplatelet therapy): 14.7% versus 16.4% (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 - 0.98, p = 0.02, fig.1).

Ischemic endpoints in TRACER

Fig 1. Ischemic endpoints in TRACER

Surprisingly, stent thrombosis was not reduced by vorapaxar: 1.7% for vorapaxar and 1.5% for placebo (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.78 - 1.62, p = 0.54). Moreover, there was a substantial increase of GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding with vorapaxar: 7.2% in the vorapaxar group vs 5.2% in the placebo group (HR 1.35; 95% CI 1.16 - 1.58. p < 0.001, fig. 2). Disturbing was the increase in intracranial bleeding:  1.1% and 0.2% (HR 3.39, 95% CI 1.78 - 6.45, p < 0.001, fig. 2). The rates of total stroke, fatal stroke or fatal bleeding were not significantly increased by vorapaxar.

Bleeding in TRACER

Fig 2. Bleeding in TRACER

Thus, triple antiplatelet therapy with vorapaxar, clopidogrel and aspirin in the acute phase of ACS and  thereafter produces a moderate reduction in recurrent ischemic events when compared to clopidogrel and aspirin alone, with a considerable increase in moderate to severe bleeding and an unacceptable tripling of intracranial bleeding.  Whether this form of novel antiplatelet therapy is efficacious and acceptably safe, relative to standard of care (mostly single antiplatelet treatment) for secondary prevention in chronic atherothrombotic disease is being evaluated in the giant TRA2P TIMI 50 study. The study arm with patients with a recent stroke or TIA had to be discontinued due to excess intracranial bleeding with vorapaxar.


The oral direct Xa blocker rivaroxaban has now been approved for both DVT prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In ACS it has been tested in a phase II dose finding study, where the 5mg and 10mg daily doses were found to be acceptably safe and effective on top of single or dual antiplatelet therapy3 and were picked out for phase III evaluation in ACS. These doses are a fourth and a half, respectively, of those used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in the ROCKET-AF trial4.
   In ATLAS-2 TIMI 51 a total of 15,526 patients with a recent ACS were randomized double-blind to 2.5 mg or 5 mg rivaroxaban bid or placebo on top of dual antiplatelet therapy5. Follow-up was for a mean of 13 months. The primary efficacy end point (cardiovascular death, MI and stroke) was reduced from 10.7% with placebo to 8.9% with rivaroxaban (HR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.74 - 0.96, p = 0.008, fig.3) with significant benefit for both the 2.5 mg bid dose (9.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.02) and 5 mg bid dose (8.8% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.03). Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg bid reduced cardiovascular (2.7% vs.4.1%, p = 0.002) and total death (2.9% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.002), which was not observed with the 5 mg bid dose.

Efficacy in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51

Fig 3. Efficacy in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51

Remarkably, both rivaroxaban doses reduced stent thrombosis by 31% from 2.9% to 2.3% (p = 0.008) in comparison to antiplatelet therapy alone (fig. 4).

Stent thrombosis in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51
Fig 4. Stent thrombosis in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51

Rivaroxaban increased the rates of non-CABG TIMI major bleeding (2.1% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.6% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.009), but without a significant increase in fatal bleeding (0.3% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.66, fig. 5). The 2.5 mg bid dose led to fewer fatal bleeding events than 5 mg bid (0.1% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.04).

Bleeding in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51
Fig 5. Bleeding in ATLAS-2 TIMI 51

Thus, low-dose novel oral anticoagulation with a Xa inhibitor on top of dual antiplatelet reduces ischemic complications after ACS, but at a considerably increased risk of major, but not fatal, bleeding. This is in contrast with the results of a recent large and similar trial with the Xa blocker apixaban (APPRAISE-2) using the same dose as tested in atrial fibrillation against warfarin6. In ATLAS-2 a much lower dose was applied than in the successful ROCKET-AF trial in atrial fibrillation4. Apparently, proper dosing is essential to optimize efficacy at an acceptable bleeding risk, when anticoagulation is applied not only in atrial fibrillation, but also in ACS and thereafter. Examples are warfarin, enoxaparin, fondaparinux7 and recently the novel oral Xa blocker darexaban (see below). Finally, in ATLAS-2, stent thrombosis was reduced with oral anticoagulation. This was also seen with apixaban in APPRAISE-2, but not with triple antiplatelet therapy in TRACER (see above), suggesting that the coagulation cascade plays an important role in the pathogenesis of stent thrombosis.

The RUBY-1

Besides apixaban and rivaroxaban another oral direct Xa blocker darexaban has been tested in secondary prevention of ACS.
In the RUBY-1 dose finding trial 1,279 patients with a recent ACS were randomized double-blind to one of six darexaban regimens: 5 mg bid, 10 mg qd, 15 mg bid, 30 mg qd, 30 mg bid, 60 mg qd or placebo on top of dual antiplatelet therapy87. Follow-up was for a mean of 22 weeks. Compared with placebo, there was a dose-related increase (p < 0.009) in the rate of major or clinically relevant bleeding (primary endpoint: 6.2, 6.5, and 9.3% for 10, 30, and 60 mg daily, respectively, fig. 6), which was statistically significant for 30 mg bid (p < 0.002).

Bleeding in RUBY-1

Fig 6. Bleeding in RUBY-1

Although the study was not powered for efficacy, there seems to be a surprising direct dose relation with ischemic endpoints (fig. 7). 

Ischemic endpoints in RUBY-1

Fig 7. Ischemic endpoints in RUBY-1

   In conclusion, like the other oral Xa blockers, darexaban increases bleeding when given together with dual antiplatelet therapy. Only the lowest dose had acceptable safety and carries some promise for ischemic event reduction. Whether the drug will be evaluated in further studies is uncertain.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC or CofactR)

   Antidotes against the novel oral anticoagulants seem needed, but none is available at the momenthas emanated valuable .
In an elegant placebo-controlled crossover study 12 volunteers were given prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC or CofactR) after therapy with either dabigatran (150 mg bid) or rivaroxaban (20 mg bid) for 2.5 days98. Rivaroxaban induced a significant prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) when compared with baseline, which was immediately and completely reversed by PCC. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was inhibited by rivaroxaban and also normalized with PCC, whereas placebo had no effect (fig. 8).

Reversal of rivaroxaban by PCC or placebo

Fig. 8. Reversal of rivaroxaban by PCC or placebo

Dabigatran increased the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), and thrombin time (TT). Administration of PCC did not restore these coagulation tests (fig. 9).

Reversal of dabigatran by PCC or placebo

Fig. 9. Reversal of dabigatran by PCC or placebo

    Thus, theoretically, PCC may be an effective antidote for rivaroxaban, but not for dabigatran. Whether this works clinically in patients, let alone in patients with active bleeding, remains to be established.

The BRIDGE trial 

     Finally, interruption of antiplatelet therapy is deemed necessary when major surgery is planned. Both aspirin and clopidogrel are long acting agents. A; after their cessation for coronary surgery they may be ‘bridged’ by an antiplatelet agent with a fast onset and offset of action.
    In the BRIDGE trial 210 patients with an ACS or treated with a coronary stent and receiving a thienopyridine awaiting CABG were randomized to cangrelor (an intravenous P2Y12 receptor antagonist) or placebo after thienopyridines were stopped109. Study drug was given for at least 48 hours and was discontinued 1 to 6 hours before CABG. The primary efficacy endpoint was platelet reactivity (measured in P2Y12 reaction units [PRUs]) assessed daily. Patients treated with cangrelor had low levels of platelet reactivity throughout the entire treatment period compared with placebo, and platelet function was restored immediately after infusion of study drug was terminated (fig. 10)

Platelet reactivity with cangrelor or placebo after thienopyridine cessation before CABG

Fig 10. Platelet reactivity with cangrelor or placebo after thienopyridine cessation before CABG

Pre-, per- and postoperative bleeding was not increased by cangrelor. Ischemic events were not different either.
Infusion of a very short acting intravenous platelet inhibitor after thienopyridine discontinuation for CABG is feasible and is able to suppress platelet activity almost completely. The therapy seems safe, although the study was too small for conclusions on clinical events.


  1. Becker RC, Moliterno DJ, Jennings LK, et al. Safety and tolerability of SCH 530348 in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study. Lancet 2009;373:919-928
  2. Tricoci P, Huang Z, Held C et al. Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:20-33
  3. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet 2009;374:29-38.
  4. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365:883-891
  5. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012;377:9-19
  6. Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011;365:699-708
  7. Simoons ML, Bobbink IW, Boland J et al. A dose-finding study of fondaparinux in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Pentasaccharide in Unstable Angina (PENTUA) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2183-90
  8. Steg PG, Mehta SR, Jukema JW, et al. E RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2011:32:2541-2554
  9. Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation 2011;124:1573-1579
  10. Angiolillo DJ, Firstenberg MS, Price MJ, et al. Bridging antiplatelet therapy with cangrelor in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;307:265-274 

Notes to editor

The author thanks the members of the Nucleus of the Working Group on Thrombosis for their editorial advices.
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

Working Group on Thrombosis

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903Sophia Antipolis, FR