Our mission is to become a worldwide reference for education in the field for all professionals involved in the process to disseminate knowledge & skills of Acute Cardiovascular Care.
Our mission is to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging in Europe.
Our mission is to promote excellence in research, practice, education and policy in cardiovascular health, primary and secondary prevention.
Our mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease through percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
Improving the quality of life and reducing sudden cardiac death by limiting the impact of heart rhythm disturbances.
Our mission is to improve quality of life and longevity, through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, including the establishment of networks for its management, education and research.
The ESC Working Groups' goal is to stimulate and disseminate scientific knowledge in different fields of cardiology.
The ESC Councils' goal is to share knowledge among medical professionals practising in specific cardiology domains.
The study design was an observational cohort study, among university hospital DCM patients. The study group comprised 184 consecutive patients with DCM. Individuals with signs or symptoms of ongoing myocarditis or diagnosed with significant coronary artery disease were excluded. CE-CMR was performed on a 1.5 T clinical scanner. LGE was evaluated by two independent observers. For quantification of fibrosis, LGE was defined as areas with a signal intensity >2 SD above the mean signal intensity. Areas were measured by manual planimetry and expressed as percentage of myocardial mass. Those who had been initially diagnosed as having DCM and displaying a subendocardial or transmural pattern of late gadolinium enhancement suggestive of myocardial infarction were excluded from final analysis.
The composite end point included cardiac death, hospitalization for decompensated heart failure, or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge for a mean + SEM of 685+ 30 days.
The authors found LGE in 72/184 patients (39%). LGE associated with a significantly lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (31% (20.9-42.2%) vs 44% (33.1-50.9%), p < 0.001), higher LV end-diastolic volume index and higher LV mass. Individuals with LGE were more likely to experience the composite end point (15/72 vs 6/112, p= 0.002). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) showed that a LGE of >4.4% of LV mass was optimal discriminator for the composite end point. LGE retained its independent predictive value also in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Importantly, the prognostic significance of LGE was dependent on the degree of LV dysfunction so that those with severely impaired LV function had more unfavorable outcome.
The authors discussed that LGE probably reflects the segmental replacement fibrosis whereas the diffuse interstitial fibrosis is not visualized by contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI. They concluded that in this DCM patient cohort LGE was associated with pronounced LV remodelling, functional impairment and adverse outcome. The possible mechanisms could be the arrhythmogenicity of local fibrotic areas and loss of ventricular compliance due to fibrosis. The role of LGE in clinical decision making has not yet been clarified.
This was so far the largest DCM cohort studied with CE-CMR. Examining the relationships between patterns and amount of LGE and adverse cardiac remodelling may increase our understanding of the mechanisms of heart failure. Data from genetically characterized DCM populations could possibly in the future reveal whether some of the LGE patterns might reflect different ethiologies of DCM.
1. Hombach V, Merkle N, Torzewski J, et al. Electrocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters as predictors of a worse outcome in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 2009; 30:2011-18.
2. Wu KC, Thiemann DR, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance heralds an adverse prognosis in noninschemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2003; 108:54-9.
3. Schalla S, Bekker SC, Dennert R, et al. Replacement and reactive myocardial fibrosis in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with right ventricular biopsy. Eur J Heart Fail 2010;12:227-31.
4. Iles L, Pfluger H, Phrommintikul A, et al. Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52:1574-80.
5. O'Hanlon R, Grasso A, Roughton M, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:867-874.
6. Assomul RG, Prasad AK, Lyne J, Smith G, Burman ED, Khan M, Sheppard MN, Poole-Wilson PA, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006: 48: 1977-85.
7. Nanjo S, Yoshikawa K, Harada M, Inoue Y, Namiki A, Nakano H, Yamazaki J. Correlation between left ventricular diastolic function and ejection fraction in dilated cardiomyopathy using magnetic resonance imaging with late gadolinium enhancement. Circ J 2009: 73:1939-44.
8. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Raymond JK. Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 2005: 26:1461-74.
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
© 2017 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved