In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Cardiac progenitors instruct second heart field fate through Wnts

Commented by the ESC WG on Development, Anatomy & Pathology

Cardiovascular Development and Anatomy

The Wnt signalling pathway has multiple, well-characterised roles in mammalian heart development (1). One of these roles is in the second heart field (SHF), where Wnt signalling is required to maintain proliferation (ref). However, since there are 19 Wnt ligands (2), and these secreted molecules are capable of diffusing some distance from their source, the identity and origin of the Wnt ligands required for SHF development are not well established. In this paper, Miyamoto and colleagues use an elegant approach to address this problem. Secretion of Wnt ligands requires the Wntless (Wls) protein (2), thus conditional deletion of the Wls gene in different regions of the developing embryos can be used to address the origin of Wnt ligands. Broad deletion of Wls in precardiac mesoderm using Mesp1-Cre resulted in a lack of right ventricle and outflow tract structures at embryonic day (E) 9.5, conforming an essential role for Wnt signalling in SHF development. Likewise, deletion using Isl1-Cre (expressed in both FHF and SHF) gave the same phenotype, confirming that Wnt ligands expressed in the cardiac progenitors are required for SHF development. However, deletion in just the anterior SHF (which contributes cells to the RV and OFT), using Tbx1-Cre, did not lead to cardiac defects. This suggests that the source of the Wnt must be outside the anterior SHF.

To investigate further, the authors performed scRNASeq of Mesp1+ cells to compare the effects of Wls deletion at W8.0. E8.5 and E9.5. After unsupervised clustering, they examined Wnt ligand expression levels. In normal cells, only the FHF cells expressed appreciable levels of Wnt ligands, in particular Wnt2. They then analysed the effects of Wls deletion on all clusters, using trajectory analysis comparing the progression from E8.0 to E9.5. This pointed to decreased cell proliferation in the aSHF as a key mechanism for the knockout heart phenotype, which they then verified in vivo. This supports previous work using ß-catenin knockout in the anterior SHF (3). Next, they used basic ligand-receptor analysis of the scRNASeq data to identify Fzd4 as the most likely receptor in the anterior SHF. Finally, they validated that Wnt2-Fzd signalling was able to stimulate SHF proliferation in an in vitro precardiac organoid system.

This paper provides further evidence for a key role of canonical Wnt signalling in maintining the anterior SHF cells in a proliferative state. Surprisingly, the source of the Wnt signal is likely to be the adjacent FHF cells, which have already begun the differentiation process into cardiomyocytes.

References


  1. Zhang, X. et al. Robust genome editing in adult vascular endothelium by nanoparticle delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid DNA. Cell Reports 38, 110196 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110196
  2. Luxán, G. & Dimmeler, S. The vasculature: a therapeutic target in heart failure? Cardiovascular Research (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab047.
  3. D’Amato, G. et al. Endocardium-to-coronary artery differentiation during heart development and regeneration involves sequential roles of Bmp2 and Cxcl12/Cxcr4. 2021.10.25.465773 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.25.465773v1 (2021) doi:10.1101/2021.10.25.465773.
  4. Münch, J., Grivas, D., González-Rajal, Á., Torregrosa-Carrión, R. & de la Pompa, J. L. Notch signalling restricts inflammation and serpine1 expression in the dynamic endocardium of the regenerating zebrafish heart. Development 144, 1425–1440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.143362
  5. Marín-Juez, R. et al. Coronary Revascularization During Heart Regeneration Is Regulated by Epicardial and Endocardial Cues and Forms a Scaffold for Cardiomyocyte Repopulation. Dev Cell 51, 503-515.e4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2019.10.019
  6. Mingozzi, F. & High, K. A. Immune responses to AAV vectors: overcoming barriers to successful gene therapy. Blood 122, 23–36 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-01-306647.
  7. Luo, Y.-L. et al. Macrophage-Specific in Vivo Gene Editing Using Cationic Lipid-Assisted Polymeric Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 12, 994–1005 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b07874
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

ESC Working Group on Development, Anatomy & Pathology

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903, Sophia Antipolis, FR

Tel: +33.4.92.94.76.00