Our mission is to become a worldwide reference for education in the field for all professionals involved in the process to disseminate knowledge & skills of Acute Cardiovascular Care.
Our mission is to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging in Europe.
Our mission is to promote excellence in research, practice, education and policy in cardiovascular health, primary and secondary prevention.
Our mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease through percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
Improving the quality of life and reducing sudden cardiac death by limiting the impact of heart rhythm disturbances.
Our mission is to improve quality of life and longevity, through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, including the establishment of networks for its management, education and research.
The ESC Working Groups' goal is to stimulate and disseminate scientific knowledge in different fields of cardiology.
The ESC Councils' goal is to share knowledge among medical professionals practising in specific cardiology domains.
OUR MISSION: TO REDUCE THE BURDEN OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
In patients with poor blood pressure control despite treatment with a combination of three drugs (‘resistant hypertension’), addition of the diuretic spironolactone was significantly more effective than adding other blood pressure lowering drugs, according to results of the PATHWAY-2 trial.
EMBARGO 31 August 2015 at 09:00 BST
STUDY NAME: The PATHWAY-2 Trial
SESSION NAME: Hot Line IV - Hypertension
The Hot Line findings, presented today at ESC Congress 2015, suggest spironolactone “was a clear winner and should be first choice for the additional treatment of resistant hypertension,” said investigator Bryan Williams, MD.
“These results have broad international relevance and applicability,” noted Professor Williams, who is from University College London, and the British Hypertension Society Research Network.
“The PATHWAY-2 study showed that spironolactone was overwhelmingly the most effective blood pressure-lowering therapy compared to bisoprolol or doxazosin and suggest that the predominant underlying cause of resistant hypertension is sodium retention - even among patients with baseline diuretic therapy. This establishes, for the first time, a clear hierarchy for drug treatment of resistant hypertension which should influence future treatment guidelines and clinical practice globally.”
Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite treatment with at least 3 BP-lowering medications. Prior to PATHWAY-2 there was no strong evidence supporting recommendations for the most appropriate additional drug to control blood pressure, and “there has been a growing perception that controlling BP in resistant hypertension is beyond the reach of existing drug therapies,” explained Professor Williams. “But PATHWAY-2 shows that control is possible in the majority of patients, using a drug that has been available for many decades.”
While the pathogenesis of resistant hypertension is poorly understood, one hypothesis is that it could be related to sodium retention – a result of reduced diuretic doses in recent years, he said.
PATHWAY 2 examined whether additional diuretic therapy with spironolactone would be the most effective at reducing BP compared to treatment with two other antihypertensives that have different mechanisms of action: doxazosin which acts to reduce arterial resistance, and bisoprolol which acts to reduce cardiac output.
The study included patients with resistant hypertension who were already treated with maximally tolerated doses of a combination of three drugs: an ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB); a calcium channel blocker (CCB); and a thiazide type diuretic. “The key question was, which drug should be added to get blood pressure controlled,” said Professor Williams.
Uncontrolled BP was defined as seated clinic systolic BP of 140 mmHg or more for non-diabetic patients, or 135 mmHg or more for patients with diabetes, and a home systolic BP (HSBP) 130mmHg for all patients. In addition to their baseline BP therapy, patients were randomised to sequentially receive 12 weeks of spironolactone (25-50mg), bisoprolol (5-10mg), doxazosin (4-8mg modified release) and placebo in random order.
Blood pressure was measured with an automated BP monitor and recorded both in the clinic as well as at home over 4 consecutive days at baseline as well as at 6 and 12 weeks of each treatment cycle.
The primary end-point was average home systolic blood pressure (HSBP) for each of the treatments, with clinic systolic BP being a secondary endpoint.
In 314 patients, spironolactone had superior HSBP control compared to placebo (a reduction of 8.70 mmHg, P<.001); doxazosin (a reduction of 4.03 mmHg, P<0.001), and bisoprolol (a reduction of 4.48 mmHg, P<0.001); as well as the mean of doxazosin and bisoprolol (a reduction of 4.26 mmHg, P<0.001).
Overall, almost three quarters of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure saw a major improvement in their blood pressure on spironolactone, with almost 60% meeting a stringent measure of blood pressure control (P<0.001). Spironolactone was the best drug at lowering blood pressure in 60%, whereas bisoprolol and doxazosin where the best drug in only 17% and 18% respectively.
Clinic measurements mirrored the HSBP measurements except there was a large placebo effect in the clinic that was not seen at home.
“This is the first study to use home BP rather than clinic BP as a primary outcome in these patients,” noted Professor Williams. “Not only did this reduce the placebo effect but it also eliminated patients with ‘white coat hypertension’ whose BP may have been spuriously elevated due to clinic anxiety.”
The findings “challenge the concept that that resistant hypertension cannot be treated adequately with drug therapies, and suggest that treatments which have a natriuretic action, in that they promote sodium excretion, are likely to be the most effective,” he concluded.
This trial, and PATHWAY-3, being presented in the same Hotline session, are part of the PATHWAY programme of trials in Hypertension undertaken by academic investigators within the British Hypertension Society, led by Professor Morris Brown of the University of Cambridge, Professor Williams, and Professor Tom MacDonald of the University of Dundee.
SOURCES OF FUNDING: The study was funded by a special project grant from the British Heart Foundation. Further funding was provided by the National Institute for Health Research Comprehensive Local Research Networks.
DISCLOSURES: Professor Williams has BW has received honoraria for lectures on hypertension from Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Daiichi Sankyo and Pfizer.
ESC Press OfficeFor background information, please contact the ESC Press Office.For independent comment on site, please contact the ESC Spokesperson coordinator: +44 7785 467 947
About the European Society of CardiologyThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) represents more than 90 000 cardiology professionals across Europe and worldwide. Its mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in Europe. About ESC Congress 2015ESC Congress is the world’s largest and most influential cardiovascular event contributing to global awareness of the latest clinical trials and breakthrough discoveries. ESC Congress 2015 takes place 29 August to 2 September at ExCel London in London, UK. Access the scientific programme. More information is available from the ESC Press Office at email@example.com.To access all the scientific resources from the sessions during the congress, visit ESC Congress 365. This press release accompanies both a presentation and an ESC press conference at the ESC Congress 2015. Edited by the ESC from material supplied by the investigators themselves, this press release does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Society of Cardiology. The content of the press release has been approved by the presenter.
© 2017 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved