In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

AMERICA - No Benefit to Detecting and Treating Extra-Coronary Lesions

Non-Invasive Imaging


Rome, Italy – 29 August, 2016 : In patients with high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD), an active strategy of detecting and treating asymptomatic multisite artery disease (MSAD) combined with intensive medical therapy did not improve 2-year outcomes compared to a more traditional approach of managing only  symptomatic coronary and extracoronary lesions, new research shows.

Findings from the AMERICA (Active detection and Management of the Extension of atherothrombosis in high Risk coronary patients In comparison with standard of Care for coronary Atherosclerosis) study were presented during a Hot Line session at ESC Congress 2016.

The study, conducted by the ACTION study group (www.action-coeur.org), found no significant difference between the intensive and standard approaches in 2-year rates of all-cause mortality, rehospitalisation for an ischemic event, or organ failure, reported lead investigator Jean-Philippe Collet, MD, PhD from the Institut de Cardiologie Hopital Pitié-Salpetrière, in Paris France.

The prevalence and the associated-risk of asymptomatic extra-coronary lesions (ECL) in high risk coronary patients are unknown, and whether their systematic identification and appropriate treatment is relevant, has never been established, said Professor Collet.

The study enrolled 521 CAD patients who were considered high-risk based on either recently diagnosed three-vessel disease (within the past 6 months) or acute coronary syndrome in the past month (in patients ≥75 years old).

The patients were randomised to a pro-active prevention program including revascularization of asymptomatic MSAD when appropriate, life style changes, and an aggressive pharmacological approach (n=263); or to a more conventional strategy based on treatment of CAD and only symptomatic ECL (n=258).

There was no difference in the rate of the primary endpoint (44.9%) compared to patients in the conventional strategy group (43.0%; hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.34], reported Professor Collet.

Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rate of the main secondary end point: a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularization. This occurred in 12.9% of the patients in the intensive group and 13.6% of those in the conventional group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50).

Major bleeding events also occurred at a similar rate (4.6% vs 5.0% respectively; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.91).

Although the intensive strategy identified asymptomatic MSAD in 23% of patients, and resulted in aggressive secondary prevention in 45.3%, it led to very few additional revascularization procedures (3.6%),  and ultimately resulted in no clinical benefit over conventional management, concluded Professor Collet.

“Possible explanations for the failure of the pro-active strategy were that revascularization of MSAD lesions was rare and that pharmacological treatment was close to optimal in both groups,” he said, adding, “This study has important practical implications for the daily life.”

Ends

Notes to editor

Sources of funding: Sponsored by Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris and funded by the Institut de l’Athérothrombose.

Disclosures: Prof Collet rescieves research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Guerbet Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Cordis, Stago, Centocor, Fondation de France, INSERM, Federation Francaise de Cardiologie, and Société Française de Cardiologie; and consulting fees from Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, and Eli Lilly.

ESC Press Office
For background information, please contact the ESC Press Office at media@escardio.org.

For press enquiries, please contact, the Media & Press Coordinator, Jacques Olivier Costa: +393427028575 

For independent comment on site, please contact the ESC Spokesperson coordinator, Celine Colas: +393402405148 

To access all the scientific resources from the sessions during the congress, visit ESC Congress 365.  

About the European Society of Cardiology

The European Society of Cardiology brings together health care professionals from more than 120 countries, working to advance cardiovascular medicine and help people lead longer, healthier lives.

About ESC Congress 2016

ESC Congress is the world’s largest gathering of cardiovascular professionals contributing to global awareness of the latest clinical trials and breakthrough discoveries. ESC Congress 2016 takes place 27 to 31 August at the Fiera di Roma in Rome, Italy. The scientific programme is here. More information is available from the ESC Press Office at press@escardio.org

 

This press release accompanies both a presentation and an ESC press conference at the ESC Congress 2016. Edited by the ESC from material supplied by the investigators themselves, this press release does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Society of Cardiology. The content of the press release has been approved by the presenter.