Read your latest personalised notifications
No account yet? Start here
Don't miss out
Ok, got it
Dr. Raphael Rosenhek ,
Probably the most important decision in patients with significant valvular heart disease is aimed at the optimal timing of valve surgery. However, as long as these patients are followed conservatively, apparently minor decisions with regard to the initiation or continuation of ACE-Inhibitors, which are among the most commonly prescribed drugs, can nevertheless be very controversial. Their use is particularly controversial in patients with aortic stenosis and in the settings of both aortic and mitral regurgitation.
Calcific aortic valve disease is diagnosed increasingly often in the older age populations. The presence of aortic stenosis or even aortic sclerosis is not only associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular risk factors, but it is also a marker of increased general and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Summarizing the published studies, it appears that around 40% of patients with aortic stenosis have concomitant hypertension (1, 2). Patients with aortic stenosis are a population at high risk for cardiovascular events (2), thus requiring a thorough adjustment of their risk factors, one of them being arterial hypertension. However, treatment of hypertension in patients with aortic stenosis is problematic since most antihypertensive agents are contraindicated in aortic stenosis.
There is particular concern that vasodilators may lead to a reduction of the coronary perfusion pressure. In fact, the use of ACE-Inhibitors in aortic stenosis is classically considered to be contraindicated (3). The guidelines only mention and justify the use of ACE-Inhibitors in patients with significant aortic stenosis who have depressed left ventricular function and who are not candidates for aortic valve surgery (4) – with no mention being made of patients with normal left ventricular function and those who are potential candidates for surgery.
In this context, the observation that the prescription rates for ACE-Inhibitors among patients with aortic stenosis may be as high as 50%, may appear surprising.
Although not designed to assess the safety of ACE-Inhibitor use in patients with aortic stenosis, the findings of a retrospective study indicate that a significant number of patients with aortic stenosis seen in daily clinical practice receive treatment with ACE-Inhibitors because of concomitant arterial hypertension (102 of 211 patients) (5). The observation that a high proportion of patients with documented aortic stenosis already receives ACE-inhibitors is also shared by O’Brien and colleagues. In their series, 30% received an ACE-Inhibitor (6). There are also data suggesting that their use may be safe in aortic stenosis. O’Brien and colleagues have recently demonstrated that the initiation of ACE-Inhibitors was safe and well tolerated in a group of 13 patients with mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular function (6).
In the SCOPE-AS trial, symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular function who were no candidates for surgery, were randomized to treatment with enalapril or placebo7. ACE-inhibitors were well tolerated in these patients, however patients, having reduced left ventricular functions, were prone to develop hypotension.
Finally, Jimenez-Candil and colleagues designed an elegant drug withdrawal study. 20 patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis already receiving and ACE-Inhibitor were included (8). Both the withdrawal and the careful reintroduction of the drug were well tolerated. While taking the ACE-Inhibitor, patients had a lower blood pressure, higher transvalvular gradients but kept an unchanged exercise capacity and symptomatic status.
These data suggest that there might be a role for ACE-Inhibitors therapy in patients with aortic stenosis in the future. Nevertheless, prospective, randomized trials are required before initiating ACE-Inhibitor therapy can generally be recommended in these patients. In the frequent cases of clinically stable patient with aortic stenosis already receiving an ACE-Inhibitor, it might be preferable not to discontinue the treatment. However it has to be considered that with an increasing severity of AS, reducing the dosage of ACE-Inhibitors might be necessary, since hypertension may become less accentuated and even hypotension may develop as a result of further narrowing of the aortic valve.
In contrast to aortic stenosis, the use of an ACE-Inhibitor in aortic regurgitation is definitely not harmful. The rationale for prescribing vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation is that vasodilation leads to a reduction in the peripheral resistance, in the regurgitant volume, thus increasing the effective stroke volume. But are these hemodynamic effects translated into an improved outcome? Sconamiglio and colleagues have reported that patients with chronic aortic regurgitation who were randomized to a vasodilator treatment with nifedipine were less likely to require valve replacement within the following years than patients who were randomized to digitalis therapy (9).
However, recently, Evangelista and colleagues have observed no significant differences in outcomes between patients with severe aortic regurgitation randomized to placebo, nifedipine or ACE-inhibitors (9, 10). While the two studies are limited by their relatively small size, it is very unlikely that larger studies giving a definite answer will be performed in the near future. In the meantime, it is certainly neither an obligation nor a mistake to initiate vasodilator therapy in patients with significant aortic regurgitation.
In mitral regurgitation however, ACE-inhibitor therapy is clearly controversial. ACE-inhibitors have been found to reduce left ventricular volumes and also to reduce the regurgitant volume (11). A great concern yet, is that ACE-inhibitors may mask a beginning ventricular impairment and consequently endanger the optimal timing for surgery. Until the long-term outcome of ACE-inhibitors in patients with mitral regurgitation is studied, they should be used very carefully. Nevertheless, their use is accepted for long-term therapy of symptomatic patients or in patients with a reduced left ventricular function, who are no candidates for surgery. Furthermore, ACE-inhibitors might be beneficial as short-term therapy in patients with mitral regurgitation and significantly reduced left ventricular function before mitral valve surgery.
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.
1. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull CY, Schwaegler RG. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. May 6 1997;95(9):2262-2270. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9142003&query_hl=1
2. Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, Scholten C, Heger M, Gabriel H, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis; Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J. Feb 2004;25(3):199-205. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14972419&query_hl=3
3. Carabello BA, Stewart WJ, Crawford FA. Aortic valve disease. In: Topol E, ed. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 1998:533-555.
4. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Edmunds LH, Jr., Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, McKay CR, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Rahimtoola SH, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Eagle KA, Gardner TJ, Garson A, Jr., Gibbons RJ, Russell RO, Ryan TJ, Smith SC, Jr. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). J Heart Valve Dis. Nov 1998;7(6):672-707. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9870202&query_hl=8
5. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Loho N, Gabriel H, Heger M, Klaar U, Schemper M, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation. Sep 7 2004;110(10):1291-1295. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15337704&query_hl=3
6. O'Brien KD, Zhao XQ, Shavelle DM, Caulfield MT, Letterer RA, Kapadia SR, Probstfield JL, Otto CM. Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function. J Investig Med. Apr 2004;52(3):185-191. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15222408&query_hl=11
7. Chockalingam A, Venkatesan S, Subramaniam T, Jagannathan V, Elangovan S, Alagesan R, Gnanavelu G, Dorairajan S, Krishna BP, Chockalingam V. Safety and efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Symptomatic Cardiac Obstruction-Pilot Study of Enalapril in Aortic Stenosis (SCOPE-AS). Am Heart J. Apr 2004;147(4):E19. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15077102&query_hl=13 8. Jimenez-Candil J, Bermejo J, Yotti R, Cortina C, Moreno M, Cantalapiedra JL, Garcia-Fernandez MA. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in hypertensive patients with aortic valve stenosis: a drug withdrawal study. Heart. Oct 2005;91(10):1311-1318. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16162624&query_hl=15
9. Scognamiglio R, Rahimtoola SH, Fasoli G, Nistri S, Dalla Volta S. Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function. N Engl J Med. Sep 15 1994;331(11):689-694. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8058074&query_hl=17
10. Evangelista A, Tornos P, Sambola A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation. N Engl J Med. Sep 29 2005;353(13):1342-1349. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16192479&query_hl=19
11. Sampaio RO, Grinberg M, Leite JJ, Tarasoutchi F, Chalela WA, Izaki M, Spina GS, Rossi EG, Mady C. Effect of enalapril on left ventricular diameters and exercise capacity in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse or rheumatic heart disease. Am J Cardiol. Jul 1 2005;96(1):117-121. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15979448&query_hl=21
Dr. A. R. Rosenhek
Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna Vienna, Austria Nucleus Member of the ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
© 2018 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved