In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Additional and emerging drugs for standard therapy for patients with stable angina

The prevalence of stable angina increases with age and it can be refractory to standard treatment in up to 10% of cases. Management aims to improve prognosis and reduce symptoms. Besides lifestyle modifications and the control of risk factors, drugs include therapy to prevent myocardial infarction and death. Pharmacological therapy includes anti-anginal drugs in addition to antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin aldosterone blockers. The first-choice anti-ischaemic agents are beta-blockers (or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) and nitrates. Additional and emerging anti-anginal drugs are nicorandil, ivabradine, ranolazine and trimetazidine. In this review, aspects regarding the pharmacological update of these anti-anginal drugs including their mechanisms of action, indications, contraindications and adverse effects will be addressed.

Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndromes, Acute Cardiac Care

Background

The prevalence of angina pectoris is 3.4% in the population ≥20 years, and the age-adjusted prevalence is higher in women, especially Hispanic women, considering the population between 40 and 75 years. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute demonstrate the increase in angina pectoris with age, reaching a frequency of 11.8% and 10.9% for women and men, respectively, who are at least 80 years old [1]. A recent European registry in 10 countries including 2,420 patients with chronic coronary artery disease showed that the age was more advanced and the patients presented more comorbidities when compared to the Euro Heart Survey data, published in 2005, which included 3,779 patients [2]. The prognosis of angina pectoris depends on the patient's clinical profile and its approach, resulting in an annual mortality of up to more than 3% [3]. When, in spite of optimal medical treatment, angina is persistent, it is defined as refractory angina. This presentation occurs in between 5% and 10% of cases and it is responsible for an annual mortality of between 2% and 4% [4]. In addition to traditional pharmacological treatment, which is the first choice, there are other emerging anti-anginal drugs, whose prescription rate is low, e.g., 1.4% for ranolazine and 4.1% for ivabradine [2].

Pharmacological treatment: recent anti-anginal agents

The 2013 European guidelines on stable coronary artery disease recommend adding ivabradine, nicorandil, ranolazine (class IIa), or trimetazidine (class IIb) for second-line treatment [5]. In the United States of America, the 2014 guidelines recommended ranolazine as class IIa; the other anti-anginal agents were not considered for medical therapy [6].

Nicorandil

The effects of nicorandil on coronary vasodilation have been known since the late 1970s [7]. It is a nicotinamide nitrate derivative with a dual mechanism of action. It increases cyclic guanosine monophosphate and facilitates the opening of mitochondrial potassium adenosine triphosphate channels. This results in venous and arterial vasodilation, and the coronary arteries, and protects ischaemic myocytes by opening the mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels [8]. Nicorandil is considered as a second-line option to treat patients with stable angina when they do not tolerate or cannot use beta-blockers (or calcium channel antagonists such as verapamil and diltiazem) or when they do not respond enough to first-line medications. The most recently updated European Medicine Agency guidelines did not indicate the use of nicorandil to prevent heart attacks in patients with stable coronary artery disease [9]. However, a recent prospective, randomised and controlled study of 402 patients with stable angina demonstrated a decrease in the number of ischaemic attacks in those using nicorandil for 12 weeks in addition to the standard anti-anginal treatment [10].

Among the adverse effects are gastrointestinal, skin and mucosal ulcerations (especially if there is concomitant use of acetylsalicylic acid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). In this case, the drug should be discontinued permanently [9].

Ivabradine

This drug has been approved by the European Medicines Agency since 2005 [9]. Ivabradine selectively inhibits the If current, an important current involved in generating the early phase of spontaneous diastolic depolarisation in sino-atrial cells, reducing the frequency of action potential initiation and lowering heart rate. It decreases the body's demand for myocardial oxygen, without any effect on blood pressure or myocardial contractility or conduction times, and results in a reduction in angina symptoms and sublingual nitrate consumption. Its use is indicated for patients with sinus rhythm with heart rate ≥70 bpm, alone (in patients with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers) or in combination with a beta-blocker, based on the BEAUTIFUL trial [11]. However, the benefit of ivabradine in reducing cardiovascular events was not demonstrated by the SIGNIFY study in patients without clinical heart failure [12]. Among 12,049 patients with angina class ≥II on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society scale, there was an increased absolute risk of cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction by 1.1 percentage points. The incidence of adverse events was higher with ivabradine compared to placebo: 18% versus 2.3% for bradycardia and 5.3% versus 3.8% for atrial fibrillation. These outcomes can, in part, be attributed to a dose of 10 mg twice a day, which is higher than the recommended dose [9]. However, further analysis found no impact of bradycardia and atrial fibrillation on cardiovascular outcomes in the whole population or in the angina subgroup [13]. Therefore, physicians should be aware of these adverse effects, preventing the heart rate from falling below 50 bpm, and limiting the use of ivabradine to three months if there is no improvement in angina symptoms or if improvement is limited. In addition, since ivabradine is metabolised by CYP3A4, there is drug interaction with CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. Therefore, its concomitant use with verapamil or diltiazem is not recommended [9].

Ranolazine

Ranolazine was approved for clinical use in 2006 in the USA and in July 2008 in Europe for the treatment of chronic angina, based on the results of the MARISA and CARISA studies [14,15]. It selectively inhibits the late sodium influx in the myocardium, reducing calcium overload, attenuating the ischaemic abnormalities of ventricular repolarisation and the resulting reduced contractility. Thus, it improves exercise tolerance while reducing the frequency of angina episodes. Ranolazine can improve myocardial ischaemia without affecting heart rate or blood pressure. Although its exact mechanism has not been clarified, this anti-ischaemic effect seems to be related to the displacement of myocardial adenosine triphosphate production from fatty acid metabolism to an oxygen-efficient carbohydrate oxidation and reduction in oxygen consumption [9,14-16]. In patients with previous chronic angina, there was a decrease in the primary endpoint composed of cardiovascular death and acute myocardial infarction with the use of ranolazine. In addition, the drug has a positive effect on glucose metabolism. There was a decrease in the level of HbA1c in diabetics (of the order of 0.43% in a meta-analysis), especially in those with inadequate glycaemic control, when compared with a placebo group. There is evidence of decreased weekly frequency of episodes of angina and the use of a sublingual nitrate, also in diabetic patients [14,15]. Therefore, the use of ranolazine should be considered in patients with increased levels of HbA1c and in patients with low basal blood pressure and heart rate.

Recently, a secondary analysis of the RIVER-PCI trial demonstrated that anti-ischaemic and glycaemic control actions are observed at six months of treatment with ranolazine. However, these effects were not detected at 12 months of treatment in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with incomplete revascularisation [17].

Among its adverse effects, QT prolongation may occur. Despite this, there were no pro-arrhythmic effects, with a low incidence of ventricular tachycardia [14].

Trimetazidine

Although the anti-anginal action of trimetazidine has been known for more than 40 years in Europe, its use has only been approved since 2012 as adjunctive therapy for patients with stable angina as a class IIb recommendation. It inhibits reduction of intracellular adenosine triphosphate levels via conservation of cellular metabolism in ischaemic regions and stimulates myocardial glucose consumption through inhibition of fatty acid metabolism. Trimetazidine is effective in the treatment of stable angina compared with placebo, alone or combined with conventional anti-anginal agents, resulting in a decrease in the number of episodes of angina and nitrate consumption, and improved exercise tolerance [18,19]. It has very limited haemodynamic effects, but can cause symptoms of Parkinsonism. Therefore, among its main contraindications is Parkinson’s disease. If Parkinsonian symptoms are caused by trimetazidine and persists for more than four months after its permanent interruption, a consultation with the neurologist should be arranged [9,14,19].

The mechanisms of action, posology, major contraindications and adverse effects of these anti-anginal drugs are shown in Table 1. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs are shown in Table 2.

 

Table 1. Mechanism of action, dose, contraindications, adverse effects of the additional anti-anginal agents (5,6,9,14).

Drugs 

Mechanism of action

Dose

 Contraindications

Major adverse effects

Ivabradine

Reduction of pacemaker activity in
sinus node

Oral dose of 5 to 7.5 mg twice daily; 2.5 mg twice daily (>75 years of age or according to symptoms and heart rate)

Severe liver disease, low heart rate or heart
rhythm disorder, allergy

Bradyarrhythmia, visual disturbances 

Nicorandil

Opening the mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels 

10 mg twice daily or 5 mg twice a day (if headache);

maximum dose of 20 mg twice daily

Low blood pressure, hypovolaemia, severe heart failure, concomitant use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors and/or soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators

Gastrointestinal ulcerations, skin and mucosal ulcerations

Ranolazine

Inhibition of the late inward sodium channel

375 mg twice daily to 750 mg twice daily (prolonged-release tablets)

Severe renal insufficiency, moderate or severe hepatic impairment; concomitant administration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors or class Ia or class III anti-arrhythmic drugs (such as dofetilide, sotalol)

Nausea, constipation, dizziness, headache,  asthenia, prolongation of the QT interval

Trimetazidine

Inhibition of the reduction of adenosine triphosphate, stimulation of glucose consumption by the myocardium

20 mg  three times a day or 35 mg twice daily

Parkinson’s disease, tremors and movement
disorders, severe renal impairment

Parkinsonian symptoms, gastric discomfort, headache, movement disorders

 

 

 

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the additional anti-anginal agents (9,16,19,20).

Drug characteristics

Ivabradine

Nicorandil

Ranolazine

Trimetazidine

Oral bioavailability, %

40

75-80

35-55

-

Plasma protein blinding, %

70

weakly bound

62

15

Time to peak levels

1 hr

30-60 min

2-6 hours

1.8 hrs

Half-life, hours

2 (main), 11 (effective)

1

About 7

6 (12 in the elderly)

Steady state, days

6

4-5

3

1

Excretion

via faeces and urine to a similar extent

mainly by the urinary route

75% renal, 20% faeces

79%-84% renal

 

 

Other anti-anginal medications

There are other anti-anginal drugs that have not been authorised for use [4-6]. Among them, there is allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. Their potential mechanisms include decreased myocardial oxygen demand and improved vascular endothelial function; however, clinical data are limited [14,15]. Another medication is fasudil, a specific RhoA kinase inhibitor, which is a class of calcium antagonists, with vasodilator properties [21]. It has been used for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm. Molsidomine, a direct nitric oxide donor, can improve endothelial function. However, a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, multicentre and placebo-controlled study in patients with stable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention did not demonstrate significant differences between treatment with molsidomine compared to placebo for 12 months [22].

Conclusions

The emerging class IIa anti-anginal agents are nicorandil (nitrate-like effect, vasodilator), ivabradine (If current inhibitor) and ranolazine (late sodium current inhibitor). Trimetazidine, a partial fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, has a class IIb recommendation. They are effective for the control of episodes of stable angina, as monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers. Ranolazine is mainly useful in those patients who cannot tolerate upward titration of conventional anti-anginal agents due to the depressive effects on heart rate and blood pressure. A reduction in cardiovascular events and in the level of HbA1c with ranolazine has been shown. The choice of treatment should be personalised, based on the particularities of the patient and taking into account the contraindications and adverse effects of each medication.

 

 

References


  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jiménez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. 
  2. Komajda M, Weidinger F, Kerneis M, Cosentino F, Cremonesi A, Ferrari R, Kownator S, Steg PG, Tavazzi L, Valgimigli M, Szwed H, Majda W, Olivari Z, Van Belle E, Shlyakhto EV, Mintale I, Slapikas R, Rittger H, Mendes M, Tsioufis C, Balanescu S, Laroche C, Maggioni AP. EURObservational Research Programme: the Chronic Ischaemic Cardiovascular Disease Registry: Pilot phase (CICD-PILOT). Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 7;37(2):152-60. 
  3. Lipinska A, Zielinska M. Prognosis of angina pectoris. E-Journal of Cardiology Practice. 2017;5(4). 
  4. Henry TD, Satran D, Jolicoeur EM. Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):78-95.
  5. Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, Bugiardini R, Crea F, Cuisset T, Di Mario C, Ferreira JR, Gersh BJ, Gitt AK, Hulot JS, Marx N, Opie LH, Pfisterer M, Prescott E, Ruschitzka F, Sabaté M, Senior R, Taggart DP, van der Wall EE, Vrints CJ; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; Document Reviewers, Knuuti J, Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Claeys MJ, Donner-Banzhoff N, Erol C, Frank H, Funck-Brentano C, Gaemperli O, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Hamilos M, Hasdai D, Husted S, James SK, Kervinen K, Kolh P, Kristensen SD, Lancellotti P, Maggioni AP, Piepoli MF, Pries AR, Romeo F, Rydén L, Simoons ML, Sirnes PA, Steg PG, Timmis A, Wijns W, Windecker S, Yildirir A, Zamorano JL. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(38):2949-3003. 
  6. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, Douglas PS, Foody JM, Gerber TC, Hinderliter AL, King SB 3rd, Kligfield PD, Krumholz HM, Kwong RY, Lim MJ, Linderbaum JA, Mack MJ, Munger MA, Prager RL, Sabik JF, Shaw LJ, Sikkema JD, Smith CR Jr, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Williams SV, Anderson JL; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):e354-471. 
  7. Uchida Y, Yoshimoto N, Murao S. Effect of 2-nicotinamidethyl nitrate (SG 75) on coronary circulation. Jpn Heart J. 1978 Jan;19(1):112-24. 
  8. IONA Study Group. Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1269-75. 
  9. European Medicines Agency. Available from: www.ema.europa.eu/ema/(accessed 6 June 2017)
  10. Jiang J, Li Y, Zhou Y, Li X, Li H, Tang B, Dai X, Ma T, Li L, Huo Y. Oral nicorandil reduces ischemic attacks in patients with stable angina: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 1; 224:183-187. 
  11. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tendera M, Ferrari R; BEAUTIFUL Investigators. Ivabradine for patients with stable coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Sep 6;372(9641):807-16.
  12. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tendera M, Ferrari R; SIGNIFY Investigators. Ivabradine in stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 18;371(12):1091-9. 
  13. Fox K, Ford I, Steg PG, Tardif JC, Tendera M, Ferrari R; SIGNIFY investigators. Bradycardia and atrial fibrillation in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with ivabradine: an analysis from the SIGNIFY study. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 7; 36(46):3291-6. 
  14. Ambrosio G, Mugelli A, Lopez-Sendón J, Tamargo J, Camm J. Management of stable angina: A commentary on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Sep; 23(13):1401-12. 
  15. Rosano GM, Vitale C, Volterrani M. Pharmacological Management of Chronic Stable Angina: Focus on Ranolazine. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2016 Aug;30(4):393-8. 
  16. Cattaneo M, Porretta AP, Gallino A. Ranolazine: Drug overview and possible role in primary microvascular angina management. Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 15;181:376-81. 
  17. Fanaroff AC, James SK, Weisz G, Prather K, Anstrom KJ, Mark DB, Ben-Yehuda O, Alexander KP, Stone GW, Ohman EM. Ranolazine After Incomplete Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus: RIVER-PCI Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 9;69(18):2304-2313.  
  18. McCarthy CP, Mullins KV, Kerins DM. The role of trimetazidine in cardiovascular disease: beyond an anti-anginal agent. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;2(4):266-72. 
  19. Dézsi CA. Trimetazidine in Practice: Review of the Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Am J Ther. 2016 May-Jun; 23(3):e871-9. 
  20. Barré J, Ledudal P, Oosterhuis B, Brakenhoff JP, Wilkens G, Sollie FA, Tran D. Pharmacokinetic profile of a modified release formulation of trimetazidine (TMZ MR 35 mg) in the elderly and patients with renal failure. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2003 May;24(4):159-64.
  21. Vicari RM, Chaitman B, Keefe D, Smith WB, Chrysant SG, Tonkon MJ, Bittar N, Weiss RJ, Morales-Ballejo H, Thadani U; Fasudil Study Group. Efficacy and safety of fasudil in patients with stable angina: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 15;46(10):1803-11. 
  22. Barbato E, Herman A, Benit E, Janssens L, Lalmand J, Hoffer E, Chenu P, Guédès A, Missault L, Pirenne B, Cardinal F, Vercauteren S, Wijns W. Long-term effect of molsidomine, a direct nitric oxide donor, as an add-on treatment, on endothelial dysfunction in patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the MEDCOR trial. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jun; 240(2):351-4.

Notes to editor


Author:

Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva, MD, PhD, FESC

Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

 

Address for correspondence:

E-mail: roselisboa <roselisboa@uol.com.br>

 

Author disclosures:

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.