In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Non-invasive imaging: Role of real-time three dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography as guidance imaging modality during catheter based edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

Valvular Heart Disease

Percutaneous catheter based edge-to-edge mitral valve (MV) repair with a mitral clip (MitraClip, Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) mimics Alfieri's surgical technique, bringing the anterior and posterior leaflets together from beneath the valve with a metallic stitch (clip).
The procedure creates a ‘double orifice’ repair, re-establishing leaflet coaptation and thereby reducing mitral regurgitation (MR).

In 2005, Feldman et al published their initial feasibility data (EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) phase 1 clinical trial) of a cohort of 27 patients with moderate-to-severe MR who were symptomatic or asymptomatic with compromised left ventricular (LV) function.1Patients were selected on the basis of specific valve morphology for which the procedure was thought to be particularly suited. In the case of degenerative MV regurgitation (ie, flail leaflet), anatomical inclusion criteria were a regurgitant jet originating from the A2/P2 segment with a flail gap of <10 mm and a flail width of <15 mm. In the case of functional MV regurgitation, inclusion criteria were a coaptation length of at least 2 mm and a coaptation depth of no more than 11 mm.1 Post-procedural success (ie, residual MR ≤2+ on a scale of 4+) was achieved in 74% of cases with <1% in-hospital mortality. At 1 year, freedom from death, surgery or residual MR ≥2+ was 66%. The EVEREST II trial was presented for the first time at the 2011 American College of Cardiology Scientific Session /i2 summit and subsequently published.

2 The conclusions of this second trial was that the MitraClip, though less effective at reducing MR (a threefold greater percentage of percutaneously treated patients had ≥2+ MV regurgitation compared with surgically treated patients), was not inferior to surgical repair or replacement, with a significantly reduced adverse event rate.2 It is important to note that in the case of failure, the surgical option always remains open.


Notes to editor

Heart 2013;99:1204-1215
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.