Our mission is to become a worldwide reference for education in the field for all professionals involved in the process to disseminate knowledge & skills of Acute Cardiovascular Care.
Our mission is to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging in Europe.
Our mission is to promote excellence in research, practice, education and policy in cardiovascular health, primary and secondary prevention.
Our mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease through percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
Improving the quality of life and reducing sudden cardiac death by limiting the impact of heart rhythm disturbances.
Our mission is to improve quality of life and longevity, through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, including the establishment of networks for its management, education and research.
The ESC Working Groups' goal is to stimulate and disseminate scientific knowledge in different fields of cardiology.
The ESC Councils' goal is to share knowledge among medical professionals practising in specific cardiology domains.
Dr. Lorenz Raber
Dr. Jean Fajadet,
Read the ESC Press release
Presenter | see Discussant report
List of Authors: Lorenz Räber, MD, Michael Magro, MD, Giulio G. Stefanini, MD, Bindu Kalesan, MD, Ron T. van Domburg, PhD, Peter Wenaweser, MD, Joost Daemen, MD PhD, Yoshinobu Onuma, MD, Bernhard Meier, MD, Peter Jüni, MD, Patrick W. Serruys, MD PhD, Stephan Windecker, MD
Background: Early generation drug-eluting stents (DES) releasing sirolimus (SES) or paclitaxel (PES) are associated with an increased risk of very late stent thrombosis (VLST). It is unknown whether the risk of VLST persists with newer generation DES releasing everolimus (EES). Methods: A cohort of 12,339 patients treated with the unrestricted use of DES (3,819 SES, 4,308 PES, 4,212 EES) at two academic institutions between 2002 and 2009 were followed for a median of 2.9 years. The primary endpoint was ARC definite ST through 4 years. Results are reported as cumulative incidence per 100 person-years (CIR) and hazards are weighted using inverse probability of treatment weight to adjust for group differences. Results: During follow-up to 4 years, the overall CIR of definite ST was lower with EES (1.4%) compared with SES (2.9%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62, p<0.0001) and PES (4.4%, HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.48, p<0.0001). The CIR of early, late, and VLST amounted to 0.6%, 0.1%, and 0.6% among EES, 1.0%, 0.3%, and 1.6% among SES, and 1.3%, 0.7%, and 2.4% among PES treated patients, respectively. Differences in favour of EES were most pronounced during the very late period with a 67% (EES vs SES p=0.006) and 76% (EES vs PES p<0.0001) risk reduction, respectively. There was a trend towards a lower risk of cardiac death or MI with EES compared with SES (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.75-1.02, p=0.09) and a significant reduction with EES compared with PES (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.77, p<0.0001), which was directly related to the lower risk of ST associated events (EES vs. SES: HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.81, EES vs. PES: HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.57). The Kaplan-Meier curves show the cumulative incidence of definite ST up to 4 years. EES in blue, SES in red, and PES in green, respectively. P values are from using Cox proportional hazards models.
Conclusions: Newer generation EES reduce the risk of definite ST compared with early generation DES during long-term follow-up. The near elimination of VLST with the unrestricted use of EES overcomes the principal limitation of early generation DES and constitutes an important advance in DES safety.
Discussant | see Presenter abstract
Jean Fajadet (France)Presentation webcastPresentation slides
708007 - 708008
Hot Line III - Acute coronary syndromes
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
© 2017 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved