In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: recent developments and clinical implications

Paper commented by Dr Christos Georgakopoulos and George Lazaros EKKAN (Unit for the athletes and for hereditary cardiovascular diseases), 1st Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Pathophysiology and Mechanisms

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common disorder, affecting approximately one out of 500 individuals, and presents substantial unmet medical need. It is a quite serious disease being the leading cause of sudden death, heart failure and embolic stroke in early and mid-adult life.


Among patients with HCM, ~30% to 60% have an identifiable pathogenic or likely pathogenic genetic variant and mutations in more than 20 genes are currently known to be associated with HCM. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients with HCM are currently without any evidence of a genetic etiology to their disease, including a subgroup (up to 40% of patients) who also have no other affected family members (ie, “non-familial” HCM). These observations suggest that other novel pathophysiologic mechanisms may be responsible for or contribute to phenotypic expression in these affected patients with HCM.


In order to investigate the contribution of common genetic variants to HCM risk in patients with no identifiable myofilament mutation, Harper et al, performed two independent multi-ancestry, case–control, genome-wide association studies. In particular, 2,541 patients with HCM (64% sarcomere negative and 34% sarcomere positive) were recruited to the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Registry, versus 40,000 controls as well as 239 HCM sarcomere-negative cases recruited from the BioResource for Rare Diseases versus 7,200 controls.
Analysis of all HCM cases (sarcomere-positive and sarcomere-negative) identified 13 independent genome-wide-significant susceptibility loci for HCM (p<5×10−8). Furthermore, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability indicated that 35% of risk of developing HCM was attributable to the additive effects of common SNPs (h2g= 0.35±0.01). The common variant contribution was even more pronounced in the HCM sarcomere negative group showing 67% risk (h2g=0.68±0.16).


In addition, 27 SNPs with independent association with HCM in the all-comer HCM meta-analysis, were aggregated into a scaled weighted genetic risk score (GRS). Individuals in the top quintile showed a 2-fold increase in odds of HCM as compared with the middle 60%. The impact of the GRS on left ventricular hypertrophy in groups of cases with similar mutational mechanisms was also evaluated. A 1 standard deviation (s.d.) increase in GRS conferred a 0.71±0.35 mm increase in maximum left ventricular wall thickness (p=0.048) in carriers of MYBPC3 truncating variants (n=232) and a 0.73±0.36 mm increase (p=0.037) in carriers of MYH7 missense variants (n=186).


Observational studies have shown that hypertension, obesity and type 2 diabetes are more prevalent in individuals with HCM. This could be secondary to reduced exercise (inability or contraindication to physical activity). However, after causality testing, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) appeared to be a substantial risk factor for the development of sarcomere-negative HCM. Actually, a 1 s.d. unit increase in DBP (11.3 mmHg) conferred a fourfold increased risk of HCM (OR=3.93 (95% CI=2.86–5.41, p=3.74×10−16). The strong association with diastolic hypertension raises the possibility that sarcomere-negative HCM may represent, at least in part, an exaggerated response to hypertension in genetically susceptible individuals and could have immediate implications in therapy in this group of patients.

References


  1. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
  2. Authors/Task Force members, Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, Charron P, Hagege AA, Lafont A, Limongelli G, Mahrholdt H, McKenna WJ, Mogensen J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Nistri S, Pieper PG, Pieske B, Rapezzi C, Rutten FH, Tillmanns C, Watkins H. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 14;35(39):2733-79.
  3. Gómez J, Reguero JR, Coto E. The Ups and Downs of Genetic Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Jan;69(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.10.001.

 

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

ESC Working Group on Myocardial & Pericardial Diseases

European Society of Cardiology

European Heart House
Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 Biot

06903, Sophia Antipolis, FR

Tel: +33.4.92.94.76.00