Read your latest personalised notifications
No account yet? Start here
Don't miss out
Ok, got it
Accuracy of a diagnostic test (stress echocardiography) is the proportion of people correctly classified by the test. For stress echocardiography accuracy, along with other measures of diagnostic techniques, is mainly estimated for detection of coronary artery disease and myocardial viability.
The following standard terminology is used in diagnostic testing :
According to EAE expert consensus statement exercise, high-dose dobutamine, and high-dose (accelerated or with atropine) dipyridamole have not only similar accuracies, but also similar sensitivities (Tables 1 and 2) . It should be noted that diagnostic accuracy of any test varies according to the pre-test likelihood of CAD in the population tested.
Table 1. Dipyridamole-stress vs dobutamine-stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease
Table 2. Dipyridamole vs exercise stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease - Open the table >
In a recently performed meta-analysis  assessing diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing for coronary artery disease it was shown that discriminatory abilities of stress echocardiography and SPECT are significantly better than exercise testing with ECG alone. Overall, treadmill echo testing (LR+ = 7.94) performed better than treadmill ECG testing (LR+ = 3.57) for ruling in CAD and was similarly better at ruling out CAD (echo LR) = 0.19 vs. ECG LR) = 0.38). Bicycle echo testing (LR+ = 11.34) performed better than treadmill echo testing (LR+ = 7.94), which both outperformed treadmill ECG (LR+ = 3.57) or bicycle ECG (LR+ = 2.94).
In meta-analysis by E. Picano et al.  it was shown that dipyridamole and dobutamine have similar accuracy (87%, 95% confidence intervals, CI, 83–90, vs. 84%, CI, 80–88, p = 0.48), sensitivity (85%, CI 80–89, vs. 86%, CI 78–91, p = 0.81) and specificity (89%, CI 82–94 vs. 86%, CI 75–89, p = 0.15). It should be noted that in this meta-analysis only studies with state-of-the art protocols were considered.
The concept of myocardial hibernation was introduced by Rahimtoola to describe a condition of chronically, dysfunctional myocardium due to chronic underperfusion in patients who have coronary artery disease and in whom revascularization causes the recovery of LV function. Despite clinical relevance of viability was questioned after STICH trial, several noninvasive techniques are readily available to detect signs of viability, such as an intact cell membrane, residual glucose metabolism, or contractile reserve. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is by far the most widely used echo method for assessing viable myocardium based on presence of contractile reserve. Because hibernating myocardium represents a balance among flow and function it is possible that contractility reserve is lost while more basal characteristics, such as glucose metabolism and cell membrane integrity are preserved. This situation may explain, in part, differences in sensitivity and specificity of imaging techniques focusing on contractile reserve in comparison with perfusion imaging. Analysis of viability studies by Bax et al. (Table 3) showed reduced sensitivity and higher specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography in comparison with PET and SPECT .
As with most imaging techniques patient dependant factors can limit image quality in stress echocardiography, which can adversely affect accuracy. Ultrasound contrast agents for LV opacification are recommended by EAE consensus statement to enhance endocardial border detection when suboptimal imaging is present. Myocardial contrast echocardiography also allows qualitative and quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion. In meta-analysis by S. Abdelmoneim et al.  pooled LRs for positive test were 1.33 (1.13–1.57), 3.76 (2.43–5.80), and 3.64 (2.87–4.78) and LRs for negative test were 0.68 (0.55–0.83), 0.30 (0.24–0.38), and 0.27 (0.22–0.34) for A, b, and Ab reserves, respectively. Existing data support a moderate diagnostic accuracy of quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography in the detection of coronary artery disease.
Real time 3D stress echocardiography is a promising technique allowing simultaneous assessment of overall motion of the entire ventricle in different planes. Several studies showed feasibility of real time 3D stress echocardiography both in pharmacological and exercise-induced stress (Table 4) .
But several limitations of real time 3D stress echocardiography including low spatial and resolution, image artifacts due to respiration, patient motion have to be overcome to meet the clinical requirements.
Our Mission: To Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease
© 2019 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved