Read your latest personalised notifications
No account yet? Start here
Don't miss out
Ok, got it
Prof. Maurizio Galderisi ,
Great discussion exists among cardiologists about the best strategy to prevent and/or treat cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD): left ventricular ejection (LV) fraction (EF), assessed by echocardiography, and biomarkers (mainly troponin I) are actually used in the clinical practice to start cardio-protective therapy. Cardiac Imaging Associations have recently proposed algorithms based on the determination of global longitudinal strain, obtainable by advanced speckle tracking echocardiography, as a marker of early LV dysfunction [1,2]. This issue has an absolute clinical relevance as the diagnosis of overt CTRCD often induces clinicians to hold or stop otherwise effective cancer therapies or to apply a suboptimal cancer treatment regimen. Accordingly, as underlined in a recent Expert Consensus of European Society of Cardiology , the development of evidence-based cardioprotective strategies is a main unmet need in cardio-oncology.
The CECCY Trial  - published on JACC May 2018 - suggests an alternative way by applying cardioprotective therapy a priori in cancer patients, i.e., at the beginning of cancer therapy and independent of the evidence of cardiac symptoms/signs. This trial evaluated the role of carvedilol as a primary prevention intervention in 192 HER2-negative breast cancer patients undergoing contemporary dose anthracycline (ANT) chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or carvedilol (up-titrated every 3 weeks till the maximal dosage of 50 mg daily). The primary end-point was prevention of ≥ 10% reduction in EF at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were effects of carvedilol on troponin I, B-type natriuretic peptide and diastolic dysfunction. The primary endpoint-prevention of reduction in EF of ≥10 percentage points from baseline to 6 months was not reached (about 14% in both the carvedilol and placebo group), but the carvedilol group achieved secondary endpoints (lower increase in troponin levels and LV end-diastolic diameter and lower incidence of grade I diastolic dysfunction). The authors conclude that in patients undergoing ANT chemotherapy, carvedilol could prevent or delay the onset of cardiac damage and adverse cardiac remodeling.
The background of the CECCY Trial is represented by pre-clinical literature supporting antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effects of beta-blockade on the myocardial injury determined by ANT. Notably, a previous large retrospective study in patients treated by ANT with or without anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, suggested that beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of overt heart failure . In this context, the CECCY Trial represents the largest randomized trial of beta-blockade for the primary prevention of ANT cardiotoxicity.
While the findings of the CECCY Trial can generate some degree of enthusiasm on prophylactic beta-blockade in this clinical setting, they should also be judged with caution. The Editorial of accompaniment on JACC  rises some doubts about the application of the suggested strategy in the clinical practice. It highlights how the low incidence of abnormal LV systolic function after contemporary chemotherapy counters a primary prevention strategy under these circumstances (ANT therapy alone) and considers unclear whether troponin-based management effectively improves cardiovascular outcomes in this specific patient population. Authors of a letter regarding the CECCY Trial  note that only 37.4% of recruited patients were up-titrated to a surely effective carvedilol daily dose (28.1% at 25 mg and 9.3% at 50 mg) and that detailed information on heart rate values, the number of patients reaching a desirable heart rate target or on the possible influence of blood pressure on carvedilol titration, are lacking in the article. Could the failure in the primary endpoint be at least partially explained by the non-achievement of a sufficiently low heart rate or blood pressure? Indeed, in the rebuttal letter the authors of the CECCY Trial provide more detailed information on blood pressure and heart rate during the follow-up the patients treated by carvedilol. Nevetherless. these issues remain crucial in a clinical setting that often experiences ANT side effects such as vomit, diarrhea, and anemia, which induce hypovolemia and hypotension and possibly hinder the use of acceptable carvedilol dosages. According to these perspectives, the potentially important protective effect of carvedilol should be carefully balanced with tolerability and tailored in individual patients.
The CECCY Trial therefore highlights the need for additional, randomized controlled trials of preventive beta-blockade in larger populations as well as in patients with higher risk of severe LV dysfunction and heart failure, such as those needing high-dose ANT chemotherapy or ANT followed by trastuzumab. In parallel, additional efforts should be devoted on defining the late consequences of an asymptomatic depression of LV systolic function and optimizing risk prediction in the delicate setting of oncologic patients. The optimal strategy to prevent overt cardiotoxicity in cancer patients remains still unclear and to be defined.
Our Mission: To Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease
© 2019 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved