In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

Why Selective Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis may Currently be Appropriate: An Appraisal of the 2024 ESC Guidelines Position

Authors:  Kosmas Paraskevas

Department of Vascular Surgery, Red Cross Hospital of Athens, Greece

The recently released 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recognised that due to the low prevalence of >70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) in the general population, as well as due to the lack of evidence that screening reduces stroke risk, widespread population-wide screening should not be recommended.

On the other hand, it was supported that screening for significant AsxCS in specific, highly-selected populations might be effective, especially if the prevalence of AsxCS is >20%. These populations include hemodialysis patients, individuals with peripheral arterial or severe coronary artery disease, a carotid bruit, etc.

It was argued that when the degree of AsxCS is >70%, the 5-year ipsilateral stroke risk is nearly 15%, and therefore revascularisation may be beneficial. The rationale supporting selective screening for AsxCS is to optimize risk factor control and to initiate intensive medical therapy, rather than to select candidates for a carotid revascularisation procedure.

This view was upheld by the 2023 ESC Council on Stroke Consensus Document, as well as by the 2024 ESC Guidelines, and may promote the initiation of such selective screening programmes.

References


1. Selective Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Appraisal of the 2024 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines Position - doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.10.033

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.