Our mission is to become a worldwide reference for education in the field for all professionals involved in the process to disseminate knowledge & skills of Acute Cardiovascular Care.
Our mission is to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging.
Our mission is to promote excellence in research, practice, education and policy in cardiovascular health, primary and secondary prevention.
Our mission is to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease through percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
Improving the quality of life and reducing sudden cardiac death by limiting the impact of heart rhythm disturbances.
Our mission is to improve quality of life and longevity, through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, including the establishment of networks for its management, education and research.
The ESC Working Groups' goal is to stimulate and disseminate scientific knowledge in different fields of cardiology.
The ESC Councils' goal is to share knowledge among medical professionals practicing in specific cardiology domains.
Dr. Robert Jones,
Prof. Hamm Christian
Dr. Patrick Serruys,
Dr. Mohr Friedrich
Discussants:The Cardiologist's point of view - slides available |Hamm, Christian (Germany)The surgeon's point of view - slides available |Jones, Robert (USA)
Read the "surgeon's point of view" report below :The strengths of the SYNTAX Study are its inclusive design which relies more on clinical judgement then lists of inclusion /exclusion criteria for patient eligibility, and the high quality of care the patients received after randomization to either PCI or CABG for left main or 3 vessel CAD management.Unfortunately the study was underpowered and did not provide a definitive result for the primary outcome, which was non inferiority of PCI. A higher rate of repeat revascularization for PCI than CABG was the reason for the negative result. This result leaves unresolved the appropriateness of use of PCI in patients with LM disease who might be willing to accept the risk of a second PCI to avoid the more invasive CABG. Longer follow up is needed to define the true difference between these two revascularization strategies.
Hot Line II
This congress report accompanies a presentation given at the ESC Congress 2008. Written by the author himself/herself, this report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Society of Cardiology.
Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease
© 2017 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved