In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

PURE: Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in 600 urban and rural communities from 17 high, middle and low income countries: Results from the PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology)



Presenter: R. Diaz | see Discussant report

Discussant: Georg Ertl | see Presenter abstract



Today a subanalysis was presented on hypertension in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study
The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) has some unique features:
• It is a very large community based cohort study on 153,996 individuals.
• It very international including 5 continents, 17 countries, 41 centres and 628 communities.
• It offers a wide spectrum of socio-cultural background and medical care including high, middle, and low income countries, and individuals from rural and urban areas.
PURE has some minor limitations:
• The diagnosis of hypertension relies on two blood pressure measurements or self-reporting which carries some risk of false judgment. However, the large number of individuals included in the study may well balance this uncertainty.
• The definition of pre-hypertension: 120-139/80-89 may include many patients with “normal” blood pressure.
• The effect of different health care systems vs. the economic status remains unknown.
• Biological effects of ethnicities remain unclear (see Zimbabwe vs. Asian low income countries).
The major results of the study were:
• Hypertension (and other cardiovascular risk factors) represent a global epidemic
• Globally, awareness, treatment and control of HT is low.
• In rural communities in lower income countries HT control is virtually absent.
• So far, we have focused in rural communities in lower income countries mostly on infectious diseases. However, these communities require specific care also for non-communicable disease and risk factors.
• Transition from a low to a medium income country appears to broaden the complexity and spectrum of heart disease.
• Lessons learned from CVRC in high income countries may help in low income countries.
Conclusions for further development of research and patient care
• The diseases of high income countries become more and more important in low income countries.
• On the other hand, diseases so far rare and therefore not sufficiently studied in high income countries may become more frequent in high income countries along with globalization of disease.
• The study of such diseases in low income countries may improve patient care in high income countries.


709009 - 709010


Clinical Trial & Registry Update I: Updates on Prevention and Markers

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.