European Society of Cardiology
Skip navigation links
Home
About the ESC
Membership
Communities
Congresses
Education
Guidelines & Surveys
Journals
Initiatives
Welcome to the European Society of Cardiology. Our mission: to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in Europe
 

Study shows interventional cardiology staff at increased cataract risk 

Interventional cardiologists need to take greater precautions with eye health

Date: 01 Sep 2009
An alarmingly high rate of damage to the eye lenses of cardiology staff working in cath labs warns interventional cardiologists to take greater precautions with eye health, reports an abstract from Uruguay. The new data, say the authors, reflect a need for catheterisation staff to be properly trained in radiological protection.

An earlier survey among interventional radiologists at a congress in New York in 2003 revealed that 40% had lens opacities possibly attributed to radiation. Now, Ariel Duran from the University School of Medicine in Montevideo and colleagues have investigated if the same risks were present in interventional cardiology. At two regional meetings of the Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology (SOLACI), they asked interventional cardiologists and other cath lab staff to undergo pupillary dilatation and slit lamp examination of their eye lenses, with cataract staging scored by three independent ophthalmologists.

Altogether, a total of 116 cath lab personnel were screened for the study and compared with a control group of 93 age-matched volunteers never exposed to ionising radiation. 

Results show posterior subcapsular opacities were found in a 38% of cardiologists compared to 12% of the control group (p<0.005). In addition, subcapsular opacities were found in 21% of cath lab paramedics (p=0.13 when compared with controls).

For those cardiologists with posterior subcapsular lens changes, Merriam-Focht scores (identifying levels of severity of lens opacity) ranged from 0.5 to 1. Of these 12/22 reported never or infrequently using eye protection, and 13/22 reported never using leaded ceiling screens.


Conclusion “There is an imperative need to improve occupational radiation safety for interventional cardiologists and paramedical personnel to allow safe clinical work,” said Duran, adding that all routine work should be carried out with protective eyewear glasses and ceiling-suspended protection screen.

There might also be a good case, he added, to introduce routine eye screening for cath lab staff after working in the field for a few years.

Authors: Janet Fricker
ESC Congress News