In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

Improved diagnosis of idiopathic giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis by myocardial gene expression profiling

This study, by Lassner et al. aimed at the improvement of clinical diagnostics of idiopathic giant cell myocarditis (IGCM) and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), two frequently fatal human myocardial diseases.
Myocardial Disease


Currently, IGCM and CS are diagnosed based on differential patterns of inflammatory cell infiltration and non-caseating granulomas in histological sections of endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs), after heart explantation or postmortem. They report on a method for improved differential diagnosis by myocardial gene expression profiling in EMBs. They examined gene expression profiles in EMBs from 10 patients with histopathologically proven IGCM, 10 with CS, 18 with active myocarditis (MCA), and 80 inflammation-free control subjects by quantitative RT-QPCR. They identified distinct differential profiles that allowed a clear discrimination of tissues harbouring giant cells (IGCS, CS) from those with MCA or inflammation-free controls. The expression levels of genes coding for cytokines or chemokines (CCL20, IFNB1, IL6, IL17D; P < 0.05), cellular receptors (ADIPOR2, CCR5, CCR6, TLR4, TLR8; P < 0.05), and proteins involved in the mitochondrial energy metabolism (CPT1, CYB, DHODH; P < 0.05) were deregulated in 2- to 300-fold, respectively. Bioinformatic analyses and correlation of the gene expression data with immunohistochemical findings provided novel information regarding the differential cellular and molecular pathomechanisms in IGCM, CS, and MCA.

The authors concluded that myocardial gene expression profiling is a reliable method to predict the presence of multinuclear giant cells in the myocardium, even without a direct histological proof, in single small EMB sections, and thus to reduce the risk of sampling errors. This profiling also facilitates the discrimination between IGCM and CS, as two different clinical entities that require immediate and tailored differential therapy.

IGCM and CS are two disorders that only recently have been considered as distinct histopathological entities. Both are potentially lethal myocarditis forms that are infectious-negative and immune-mediated. For both of them the dismal prognosis can be improved by early diagnosis and tailored immunosuppressive therapy. Although both entities are perceived as rare conditions, two recent studies have suggested the possibility that they may be much more common than previously suspected, for instance in the group of young patients with apparently idiopathic atrio-ventricular blocks or in patients with atrial fibrillation. As for other diseases, the most severe cases are first clinically recognized, but then the medical community realise that such cases represent only the tip of the iceberg and that less severe forms are much more prevalent and underdiagnosed.  In the case of IGCM there is no distinctive clinical presentation, but, as for other forms of myocarditis, IGCM can present as acute or chronic heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial necrosis with normal coronary arteries, or a life-threatening condition (cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock). Some clinical hints are the severity of cardiac symptoms, the lack of response to standard cardiological care and the association in the patient or in family members with other extra-cardiac autoimmune conditions, such as autoimmune thyroid disease, ulcerative colitis, etc. However, as shown in the paper by Lassner et al, IGCM cases are older than previous case series in keeping with the observation that the younger IGCM patients are likely to die before the clinical diagnostics including EMB is completed.
The diagnosis of CS may be easy if cardiac signs or symptoms develop in a patient with a known diagnosis of extra-cardiac disease, but is particularly challenging in isolated CS.
The diagnosis of IGCM and CS is based upon EMB with a distinctive histopathology and the lack of infectious agents by PCR-based methods, as outlined by the recent consensus ESC document on myocarditis. EMB may fail to detect the histopathological hallmarks of the diseases, that is to say the presence of multinuclear giant cells in IGCM and the non-caseating granuloma in CS. Therefore, any diagnostic adjunctive EMB tool is welcome. In the last 2 decades EMB has gained greater diagnostic potential, since conventional histology with the time-honoured Dallas criteria has been supplemented by immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnosis of infectious agents.

Conclusion:

Myocardial gene expression profiling is emerging as yet another powerful tool to: 1) reach an etiological diagnosis and subsequent etiology-direct therapy, 2) reach differential diagnosis of IGCM, CS and lymphocytic myocarditis, 3) get an insight on different intracellular and systemic immunological pathways involved in the pathogenesis of distinct myocarditis forms in patients in vivo. This is of clinical relevance, since it can direct towards the future identification of selective immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents, including novel biological agents, targeting the predominant immune pathway or cell type involved in each myocarditis form.

References


1.    Blawet LA, Cooper LT. Idiopathic giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis. Heart Fail Rev. Special issue on myocarditis. 2013 November;18(6):733-46.
2.    Okura Y, Dec GW, Hare JM, Kodama M, Berry GJ, Tazelaar HD, Bailey KR,Cooper LT. A clinical and histopathologic comparison of cardiac sarcoidosis and idiopathic giant cell myocarditis. Am J Coll Cardiol 2003;15:322–329.
3.    Pierre-Louis B, Prasad A, Frishman WH. Cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and therapeutic options. Cardiol Rev J 2009;17:153–158.
4.    Cooper LT Jr, Hare JM, Tazelaar HD, EdwardsWD,Starling RC, Deng MC, Menon S, Mullen GM, Jaski B, Bailey KR, Cunningham MW, Dec GW; Giant Cell Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. Usefulness of immunosuppression for giant cell myocarditis. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1535–1539.
5.    Kandolin R, Lehtonen J, Kupari M. Cardiac sarcoidosis and giant cell myocarditis as causes of atrioventricular block in young and middle-aged adults. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Jun;4(3):303-9
6. Kandolin R, Lehtonen J, Salmenkivi K, Räisänen-Sokolowski A, Lommi J, Kupari M. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of giant-cell myocarditis in the era of combined immunosuppression. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jan;6(1):15-22
7. Larsen BT, Maleszewski JJ, Edwards WD, Cooper LT Jr, Sobonya RE, Thompson VE, Duckett SG, Peebles CR, Simpson IA, Tazelaar HD. Atrial giant cell myocarditis: a distinctive clinicopathologic entity. Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):39-47
8.    Caforio ALP, Pankuweit S, Arbustini E, Basso C, Gimeno-Blanes J, Felix SB, Fu M, Heliö T, Heymans S, Jahns R, Klingel K, Linhart A, Maisch B, McKenna W J, Mogensen J, Pinto Y, Ristic A, Schultheiss HP, Hubert Seggewiss H, Tavazzi L, Thiene G, Yilmaz A, Charron P, Elliott PM. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management and therapy of myocarditis. A Position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2636-48
9.    Leone O, Veinot JP, Angelini A, Baandrup UT, Basso C, Berry G, Bruneval P, Burke M,Butany J, Calabrese F, d’Amati G, Edwards WD, Fallon JT, Fishbein MC, Gallagher PJ, Halushka MK, McManus B, Pucci A, Rodriguez ER, Saffitz JE, Sheppard MN, Steenbergen C, Stone JR, Tan C, Thiene G, van derWal AC, Winters GL. 2011 consensus statement on endomyocardial biopsy from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012;21:245–274.
10.    Kittleson MM, Minhas KM, Irizarry RA, Ye SQ, Edness G, Breton E, Conte JV,Tomaselli G, Garcia JG, Hare JM. Gene expression in giant cell myocarditis: altered expression of immune response genes. Int J Cardiol 2005;102:333–340.
11.    Caforio AL, Marcolongo R, Jahns R, Fu M, Felix SB, Iliceto S. Immune-mediated and autoimmune myocarditis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Heart Fail Rev. Special issue on myocarditis. 2013 November;18(6): 715-32.
12.    Facco M, Baesso I, Miorin M, Bortoli M, Cabrelle A, Boscaro E, Gurrieri C, Trentin L,Zambello R, Calabrese F, Cassatella MA, Semenzato G, Agostini C. Expression and role of CCR6/CCL20 chemokine axis in pulmonary sarcoidosis. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 82:946–955

Notes to editor


Authors:
D. Lassner 1†*, U. Kuhl 1,2†, C. S. Siegismund1, M. Rohde1, S. Elezkurtaj3, F. Escher 1,2, C. Tschope2, U. M. Gross1,W. Poller2, and H.-P. Schultheiss2
1Institute of Cardiac Diagnostics and Therapy, Moltkestrasse 31, D-12203 Berlin, Germany; 2Department of Cardiology andPneumonology, Charite´ – University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; and 3Institute of Pathology, Charite´ – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar 24. [Epub ahead of print]

Presented by:
Alida LP Caforio, MD, PhD, FESC,
Cardiology, Dept of Cardiological Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Italy.
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.

Contact us

Working Group on Myocardial & Pericardial Diseases

European Society of Cardiology

Les Templiers
2035 Route des Colles
CS 80179 BIOT

06903Sophia Antipolis, FR