Our mission is to become a worldwide reference for education in the field for all professionals involved in the process to dissemintate knowledge & skills of Acute Cardiovascular Care
Our mission is to promote excellence in clinical diagnosis, research, technical development, and education in cardiovascular imaging in Europe.
Our mission: To promote excellence in research, practice, education and policy in cardiovascular health, primary and secondary prevention.
Our goal is to reduce the burden in cardiovascular disease in Europe through percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.
Our Mission is "to improve the quality of life of the population by reducing the impact of cardiac rhythm disturbances and reduce sudden cardiac death"
To improve quality of life and logevity, through better prevention, diagnosis and treatment of heart failure, including the establishment of networks for its management, education and research.
Working Groups goals is to stimulate and disseminate scientific knowledge in different fields of cardiology.
ESC Councils goal is to share knowledge among medical professionals practising in specific cardiology domains.
OUR MISSION: TO REDUCE THE BURDEN OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Prof. Maja-Lisa Løchen
Exploring potential mortality reductions in 9 European countries by improving diet and lifestyle: A modelling approach.
O’Flaherty et al. on behalf of the Euroheart II Steering Group.
International Journal of Cardiology 207 (2016) 286–291
The European EuroHeart ll project has recently published this important model showing how just modest and indeed feasible, but politically challenging, structural reductions in life style risk factors would cause large decline in future coronary heart disease (CHD) deaths across Europe (from 2010 to 2020) in the age groups 25-74 years.
The author group provided data from nine countries using a validated model comparing three scenarios and their predicted impact on CHD mortality. The scenarios were conservative, intermediate and optimistic. The scenarios were:
Under the conservative scenario, they estimated 10.8% less CHD deaths, compared to 29.1% fewer deaths for the optimistic scenario. The highest gain would come from dietary improvements followed by decreases in smoking and inactivity.
The potential public impact of this study is substantial. The authors underline that these improvements in behavior risk factors may not be achieved through education, individual approach, guidelines, campaigns and high risk patient treatment alone. The population approach through structural regulations and policies would be the most cost-effective and powerful.
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology