In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

CORE320: Diagnostic Performance of Combined Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320-row Detector Computed Tomography : The CORE320 Multicenter, Multinational Study

See the press release:
Munich, Germany – August 28 2012: A non-invasive imaging strategy which integrates non-invasive CT angiography (CTA) and CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTP) has robust diagnostic accuracy for identifying patients with flow-limiting coronary artery disease in need of myocardial revascularisation, according to results of the CORE320 study presented here today by Dr Joao AC Lima from Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA...
Read more

Non-invasive Imaging: Nuclear Cardiology


 

Presenter: Joao Ac Lima | see Discussant report

Discussant: Gerald Maurer

Report:

Background and rationale
CT angiography (CTA) provides morphologic information of coronary anatomy and is capable of detecting the presence of atherosclerotic lesions.  Morphologic information alone is, however, limited in its ability to predict physiological significance of coronary luminal stenosis. There is ample evidence that the benefit of revascularization is highest when stenoses are hemodynamically significant, as assessed by SPECT or by invasive measurement of  fractional flow reserve.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of combined CTA and CT perfusion (CTP) study using a 320-row detector  CT scanner to identify patients with flow limiting CAD, as compared to invasive angiography and SPECT.

Study Design
This was a multicenter (16), multinational (8), prospective study which included  391 patients with suspected coronary artery disease who had been referred for  clinically indicated coronary angiography. Noninvasive CT evaluation of coronary lesion severity (by CTA) + hemodynamic significance (by CTP) was compared to invasive angiography + SPECT and analyzed on a per patient and per vessel basis.

Main Findings
Combined CTA and CTP was capable of detecting hemodynamically significant stenoses (50% or 70%), as defined by invasive angiography with an associated SPECT perfusion defect. Furthermore, combined CTA and CTP was found to be superior to CTA alone for correctly identifying flow limiting and functionally relevant obstructive coronary artery disease and predicted revascularization with accuracy similar to invasive coronary angiography+SPECT.

Strengths of the study
This is a carefully designed, well conducted, relatively large multicenter study. It convincingly shows the ability of combined CTA and CTP study using a 320-row detector  CT scanner to provide both anatomic and functional information in coronary artery diease.

Open issues and potential limitations:
This procedure is not applicable to the entire CAD patient population, as there are a number of contraindications.
Further experience is needed to better understand the future role of this test in clinical practice. In many patients (particularly those with high pre-test likelihood of disease) proceeding directly to invasive angiography based on clinical information (±non-imaging stress test) will likely continue to be the most appropriate option.
The role of invasive FFR measurement at time of angiography versus earlier CTP needs to be addressed.
Also, while done in the same imaging session, stress CTP (using adenosine) is an additional study after CTA+rest CTP and requires  additional radiation and additional contrast administration.
320-row detector  CT scanner are currently not widely available and CTP using conventional scanners may yield different results.
Overall, issues such as exposure to radiation and contrast, as well as cost effectiveness need additional careful deliberation.

References


708009 - 708010

SessionTitle:

Hot Line III: Late Breaking Trials on Arrhythmias and CAD

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.