In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.
Did you know that your browser is out of date? To get the best experience using our website we recommend that you upgrade to a newer version. Learn more.

We use cookies to optimise the design of this website and make continuous improvement. By continuing your visit, you consent to the use of cookies. Learn more

Quality of care at discharge is affected by hospital case volume in acute myocardial infarction patients. A French nationwide assessment

Prevention


Francois Schiele, FESC Francois Schiele (France)

Presentation webcast

Presentation slides

List of Authors:
François Schiele, Frédéric Capuano, Philippe Loirat, Armelle Desplanques-Leperre, Geneviève Derumeaux, Jean-François Thebaut, Christine Gardel

Abstract:


Aims: In Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), the relationship between volume and Quality Indicators (QI) is poorly documented. Through a nationwide assessment of QI at discharge repeated for three years, we aimed to quantify the relationship between volume and QIs in survivors after AMI.

Methods: Almost all healthcare organisations in France participated. Medical records were randomly selected. Data collection was performed by a independent group. QIs for AMI were defined by an expert consensus group as appropriate prescription at discharge of aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blocker, statin and an ACE inhibitor in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <0.40. A composite QI was calculated using the “all or none” method. Volume was classed in 7 categories based on the number of admissions for AMI in 2008 (centres with <10 AMI were excluded). Odds Ratios (ORs) adjusted for age and gender with 95% CI for volume categories were calculated using logistic regression for each QI. Temporal changes were tested in centres who participated in all three campaigns.

Results: A total of 48,503 records were examined: 18,159 in 2008, 14,027 in 2009 and 16,317 in 2010. Median centre volume was 90. 291 centres were eligible for the temporal analysis. AP of antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, ACEI and statins at discharge increased significantly between 2008 and 2009, and between 2009 and 2010 for AP of ACEI, beta-blockers, statins and the composite QI. Compared to a volume of >300, a significantly lower rate of all QIs was observed in centres with the lowest volume. ORs progressively decreased with increasing volume, but reached a plateau above a threshold of 120 AMI hospitalisations per year. Despite a significant increase in the composite QI over the 3 years, a significant relation persisted between volume (±90) and quality of care.

Conclusion: Analysis of QIs at discharge demonstrates the existence of a relation between volume and quality of care. Centres with the highest volume perform better on quality measures than centres with lower volumes. Temporal analysis over 3 consecutive years confirms this relation and shows that it persists despite improvement in quality indicators between 2008 and 2010.

References


711003

SessionTitle:

Clinical Registry Highlight I - Risk and treatment reality

The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the European Society of Cardiology.