| |
Macro and microvascular alterations in diabetes mellitus
An article from the E-Journal of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice
Topics:
Diabetic heart disease
Authors: Grassi G.
The notion that diabetes mellitus is a vascular disease is a relatively old one. In the past few years, however, it has become clear that alterations in tissue perfusion involving both macrovascular and microvascular circulation are responsible for the elevated risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events characterising the diabetic patients. The vicious cycle of events, however, can be at least in part prevented by therapeutic interventions blocking the renin-angiotensin system.
1 – Diabetes as a vascular disease
Diabetes-related cardiovascular diseases are the main causes of death and disability in patients with type 2 diabetes. This is documented by the evidence that the risk of coronary artery disease is increased two to four folds in diabetes and that more than ¾ of deaths in type 2 diabetic patients have as a background a cardiovascular disease (1). Moreover, diabetics are more likely to develop congestive heart failure, ischemic and tromboembolic cerebrovascular events as well as renal failure (1), particularly when glycaemic alterations are accompanied by high blood pressure. Taking into account the pathophysiological background and the clinical outcome of diabetic vascular lesions, this paper will briefly review the macrovascular alterations, the microvascular abnormalities as well as arterial stiffness changes.
2 – Glucose metabolism, diabetes and macrocirculation
A large number of studies have shown that as glucose tolerance worsens, the stiffness of large size arteries increases, favouring blood pressure elevation, left ventricular mass increase as well as reduction in coronary blood flow (2). In the Hoorn study (3), for example, which assessed, via the ultrasonographic technique, the status of carotid arteries in elderly people with an euglycaemic state, an impaired glucose metabolism or overt diabetes, provided evidence that carotid wall stiffness increased progressively with decreasing glucose tolerance, with the greatest alterations being observed in people with manifest diabetes mellitus. These data have been confirmed and expanded by the evidence that glycaemic values are the major determinants of carotid intima-media thickness in people with impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes (4), at variance from what can be seen in euglycaemic individuals in which age and pulse pressure, i.e. the difference between systolic and diastolic values are responsible for the structural alterations of the large vessels.
These findings explain why in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, performed in more than 4000 diabetic patients, the incidence of macrovascular complications is closely related to glycosylated haemoglobin levels (5). A further consequence of the above mentioned pathophysiological alterations is the evidence that increased thickness of the aortic artery, as assessed by aortic pulse wave velocity, is closely related to glomerular filtration rate and thus to alterations in renal function (6). Together the above mentioned data supports the concept that in diabetes, vascular dysfunction is a sensitive and accurate marker of disease progression and severity.
3 – Diabetes and microcirculation
Small artery circulation resistance is characterised by important structural changes in patients with diabetes mellitus. These include increase in the media-lume ratio, a vascular remodelling process, characterised by a displacement of the smooth muscle cells around the arteriolar wall, and a hypertrophic process of smooth muscle cells, i.e. the so called “hypertrophic remodelling process”.
Alterations in microcirculation, which may favour the development and progression of capillary rarefaction, affect not only the structural patterns of microcirculation but its functional characteristics as well. Two deserve mentioning. The first one refers to the impairment of the autoregulatory homeostatic process as well as the abnormality in the myogenic tone (1). The second one, is the endothelial dysfunction, with a reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide and thus an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (1).
A question of considerable pathophysiological and clinical relevance is whether microvascular and macrovascular alterations are early phoenomena in the clinical course of the disease. The evidence collected so far seems to support the concept that all the above mentioned vascular abnormalities are of early appearance and may represent an important pathogenetic factor for the development of the disease. This is supported by the evidence, provided by a longitudinal study (10 year observation), that the incidence of new-onset diabetes increases with increasing narrowing of the retinal arterioles (7). It is also supported by the finding that the increase in arterial stiffness (and thus the reduction in arterial distensibility) reported in diabetes may be detected in normoglycaemic normotensive offspring of type 2 diabetic patients (8). This finding reinforces the hypothesis that the genetic background may be of relevance for the development and progression of the above mentioned vascular abnormalities.
4 – Clinical and therapeutic implications
In several cardiovascular diseases both the endothelial dysfunction and the microcirculatory alterations have been reported to play an important prognostic role, the greater functional and structural abnormalities being associated with a poorer prognosis (1). The evidence is still lacking in diabetes, although some data collected in diabetic patients via the assessment of the coronary vascular responses to a sympathetic stimulus (cold pressor test) may suggest that alterations in the coronary vasomotor toner is a predictor of future events (9).
Conclusion
Therapeutic modulation of macrovascular and microvascular alterations in diabetes have been shown to have a favourable therapeutic impact, particularly when drugs acting on the renin-angiotensin system, which participate throughout the pro-hypertrophic effects of angiotensin II on vascular wall at the above mentioned alterations, are used. Other key therapeutic approaches are represented by the tight blood pressure reduction (blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg) and the accurate control of blood glucose levels.
References
1. Lüscher TF, Creager MA, Beckman JA, Cosentino F. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part II. Circulation 2003;108:1655-1661.
2. Creager MA, Lüscher TF, Cosentino F, Beckman JA. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: Part I. Circulation 2003;108:1527-1532.
3. Henry RM, Kostense PJ, Spijkerman AM, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, et al. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn Study. Circulation 2003;107:2089-2095.
4. Tropeano AI, Boutouyrie P, Katsahian S, Laloux B, Laurent S. Glucose level is a major determinant of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with hypertension and hyperglycemia. J Hypertens. 2004;22:2153-2160.
5. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405-412.
6. de Jongh RT, Serné EH, IJzerman RG, de Vries G, Stehouwer CD. Impaired microvascular function in obesity: implications for obesity-associated microangiopathy, hypertension, and insulin resistance. Circulation 2004;109:2529-2935.
7. Wong TY, Shankar A, Klein R, Klein BE, Hubbard LD. Retinal arteriolar narrowing, hypertension, and subsequent risk of diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1060-1065.
8. Giannattasio C, Failla M, Capra A, Scanziani E, Amigoni M, Boffi L, et al. Increased arterial stiffness in normoglycemic normotensive offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. Hypertension 2008;51:182-187.
9. Nitenberg A, Pham I, Antony I, Valensi P, Attali JR, Chemla D. Cardiovascular outcome of patients with abnormal coronary vasomotion and normal coronary arteriography is worse in type 2 diabetes mellitus than in arterial hypertension: a 10 year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis 2005;183:113-120.
The content of this article reflects the personal opinion of the
author/s and is not necessarily the official position of the
European Society of Cardiology.
|
|